Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Root Growth and Productivity of Wheat, Chickpea and Potato as Influenced by Nutrient Management Practices

Kailash Prajapat; A. K. Vyas; Shiva Dhar

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

13 at research farm of Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to evaluate the root growth and performance of wheat, chickpea and potato grown in different soybean-based cropping systems with 5 nutrient management practices. The results revealed that root growth in terms of root length, root volume and root dry weight of wheat and chickpea were observed significantly maximum where 50% RDN was substituted with FYM along with 50% RDF. Whereas, all the root parameters of potato were higher with the fertilization of 100% RDF. All the yield parameters and yields of wheat in soybean-wheat-fallow and soybean-wheat-mungbean cropping system did not differ significantly. All the yield parameters viz., effective tillers m -2 , length of spike -1 , grains spike and 1000-grain weight as well grain and stover yields of wheat were highest with the application of 100% RDF during both the years. Similarly, the maximum values of yield attributes and tuber and haulms yields of potato were recorded with the 100% RDF during both the years. However, no significant variation among all sources of nutrient was noticed during 2011-12 and among 100% RDF and substitution of 50% RDN through FYM during 2012-13 in both the crops. Whereas, significantly maximum yield contributing parameters and grain and stover yields of chickpea were found in the treatment receiving 50% RDF+50% RDN through FYM followed by 25% RDF+50% RDN through FYM+ biofertilizers during both the years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root length, root volume and root dry weight were significantly maximal where 50% RDN was substituted with FYM along with 50% RDF.

Treatment
50% RDN was substituted with FYM along with 50% RDFe0
Outcome
root length, root volume and root dry weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root growth in terms of root length, root volume and root dry weight of wheat and chickpea were observed significantly maximum where 50% RDN was substituted with FYM along with 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea root length, root volume and root dry weight were significantly maximal where 50% RDN was substituted with FYM along with 50% RDF.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
50% RDN was substituted with FYM along with 50% RDFe0
Outcome
root length, root volume and root dry weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root growth in terms of root length, root volume and root dry weight of wheat and chickpea were observed significantly maximum where 50% RDN was substituted with FYM along with 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato root parameters were higher with the fertilization of 100% RDF.

Treatment
fertilization of 100% RDFe1
Outcome
root parameterse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Whereas, all the root parameters of potato were higher with the fertilization of 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield parameters and yields did not differ significantly between soybean-wheat-fallow and soybean-wheat-mungbean cropping systems.

Treatment
soybean-wheat-fallowe2
Outcome
yield parameters and yieldse2
Direction
did not differe2
Comparator
soybean-wheat-mungbeane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“All the yield parameters and yields of wheat in soybean-wheat-fallow and soybean-wheat-mungbean cropping system did not differ significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield components effective tillers m-2, spike length and grains per spike were highest with 100% RDF.

Treatment
100% RDFe3
Outcome
effective tillers m -2 , length of spike -1 , grains spikee3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“effective tillers m -2 , length of spike -1 , grains spike and 1000-grain weight as well grain and stover yields of wheat were highest with the application of 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat 1000-grain weight, grain yield and stover yield were highest with 100% RDF.

Treatment
100% RDFe3
Outcome
1000-grain weight as well grain and stover yieldse3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“effective tillers m -2 , length of spike -1 , grains spike and 1000-grain weight as well grain and stover yields of wheat were highest with the application of 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield attributes and tuber and haulm yields were maximal with 100% RDF.

Treatment
100% RDFe4
Outcome
yield attributes and tuber and haulms yieldse4
Direction
maximume4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the maximum values of yield attributes and tuber and haulms yields of potato were recorded with the 100% RDF during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant variation in yield was noticed among nutrient sources in 2011-12 or among 100% RDF and 50% RDN substituted with FYM in 2012-13 in both crops.

Treatment
all sources of nutriente5
Outcome
significant variatione5
Qualifier
during 2011-12e5

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e5

“no significant variation among all sources of nutrient was noticed during 2011-12 and among 100% RDF and substitution of 50% RDN through FYM during 2012-13 in both the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yield contributing parameters and grain and stover yields were significantly maximal with 50% RDF+50% RDN through FYM, higher than 25% RDF+50% RDN through FYM+ biofertilizers.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume6
Treatment
50% RDF+50% RDN through FYMe6
Outcome
yield contributing parameters and grain and stover yieldse6
Direction
maximume6
Comparator
25% RDF+50% RDN through FYM+ biofertilizerse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“significantly maximum yield contributing parameters and grain and stover yields of chickpea were found in the treatment receiving 50% RDF+50% RDN through FYM followed by 25% RDF+50% RDN through FYM+ biofertilizers during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1473 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.