Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Production potential, nutrient uptake, soil fertility and economics of soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems under organic, chemical and integrated nutrient management practices

P. RAMESH; N.R. PANWAR; A.B. SINGH; et al.

18
claims
32
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2004-05 to 2007-08 at Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, to study the effect of organic, chemical and integrated (50:50) nutrient management (INM) practices on the productivity, nutrient up- take, soil fertility and economics of 4 soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) based cropping systems involving durum wheat ( Tr iticum durum Desf), mustard ( Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss .), chickpea ( Cicer ar ietinum L) and isabgol ( Plantago ovata Fors k). The productivity of crops in these systems was higher in the integrated nutrient management compared to either chemical fertilizers or organic manures, in all the years. In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively, whereas in the fourth year (2007-08), the pro- ductivity of these crops was improved by 11.1, 1.1, 3.0, 4.2 and 11.2 % than chemical fertilizers. Among the treat- ments, soybean- durum wheat cropping system recorded the highest soybean equivalent yield (4.54 t/ha) under integrated nutrient management. Maximum uptake of N, P and K was recorded in integrated nutrient manage- ment and soybean- durum wheat cropping system. At the end of the 4 cropping cycles, application of organic ma- nures resulted in significantly higher soil organic carbon, available N, P and K than chemical fertilizers but was on par with the integrated nutrient management. Economic returns were the highest in the INM and soybean- du- rum wheat cropping system and they were similar between the treatments receiving organic manures and chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management gave higher crop productivity than either chemical fertilizers or organic manures in all years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente1
Outcome
productivity of cropse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
in all the yearse1
Comparator
chemical fertilizers or organic manurese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“The productivity of crops in these systems was higher in the integrated nutrient management compared to either chemical fertilizers or organic manures, in all the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure reduced productivity of soybean by 7.8% in the first year.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reductione1
Value
7.8e1
Qualifier
first year (2004- 05)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure reduced productivity of durum wheat by 5.6% in the first year.

Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reductione1
Value
5.6e1
Qualifier
first year (2004- 05)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure reduced productivity of mustard by 9.4% in the first year.

Taxon
mustarde1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reductione1
Value
9.4e1
Qualifier
first year (2004- 05)e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure reduced productivity of chickpea by 3.0% in the first year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reductione1
Value
3.0e1
Qualifier
first year (2004- 05)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure reduced productivity of isabgol by 2.5% in the first year.

Taxon
isabgole1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reductione1
Value
2.5e1
Qualifier
first year (2004- 05)e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure improved productivity of soybean by 11.1% compared with chemical fertilizers in the fourth year.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
improvede2
Value
11.1e2
Qualifier
fourth year (2007-08)e2
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas in the fourth year (2007-08), the pro- ductivity of these crops was improved by 11.1, 1.1, 3.0, 4.2 and 11.2 % than chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure improved productivity of durum wheat by 1.1% compared with chemical fertilizers in the fourth year.

Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
improvede2
Value
1.1e2
Qualifier
fourth year (2007-08)e2
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas in the fourth year (2007-08), the pro- ductivity of these crops was improved by 11.1, 1.1, 3.0, 4.2 and 11.2 % than chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure improved productivity of mustard by 3.0% compared with chemical fertilizers in the fourth year.

Taxon
mustarde1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
improvede2
Value
3.0e2
Qualifier
fourth year (2007-08)e2
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse2

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas in the fourth year (2007-08), the pro- ductivity of these crops was improved by 11.1, 1.1, 3.0, 4.2 and 11.2 % than chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure improved productivity of chickpea by 4.2% compared with chemical fertilizers in the fourth year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
improvede2
Value
4.2e2
Qualifier
fourth year (2007-08)e2
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas in the fourth year (2007-08), the pro- ductivity of these crops was improved by 11.1, 1.1, 3.0, 4.2 and 11.2 % than chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure improved productivity of isabgol by 11.2% compared with chemical fertilizers in the fourth year.

Taxon
isabgole1
Treatment
organic manure treatmente1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
improvede2
Value
11.2e2
Qualifier
fourth year (2007-08)e2
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse2

Verbatim

e1

“In the first year (2004- 05), the organic manure treatment recorded 7.8, 5.6, 9.4, 3.0 and 2.5 % reduction in the productivity of soybean, durum wheat, mustard, chickpea and isabgol crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–850 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas in the fourth year (2007-08), the pro- ductivity of these crops was improved by 11.1, 1.1, 3.0, 4.2 and 11.2 % than chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soybean-durum wheat cropping system had the highest soybean equivalent yield, 4.54 t/ha, under integrated nutrient management.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente3
Outcome
soybean equivalent yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
4.54 t/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e3

“soybean- durum wheat cropping system recorded the highest soybean equivalent yield (4.54 t/ha) under integrated nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum uptake of N, P and K was recorded under integrated nutrient management and the soybean-durum wheat cropping system.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient manage- mente4
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke4
Direction
Maximume4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maximum uptake of N, P and K was recorded in integrated nutrient manage- ment and soybean- durum wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures gave significantly higher soil organic carbon than chemical fertilizers after four cropping cycles.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
organic ma- nurese5
Outcome
soil organic carbone5
Direction
significantly highere5
Qualifier
At the end of the 4 cropping cyclese5
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“At the end of the 4 cropping cycles, application of organic ma- nures resulted in significantly higher soil organic carbon, available N, P and K than chemical fertilizers but was on par with the integrated nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures gave significantly higher available N, P and K in soil than chemical fertilizers after four cropping cycles.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
organic ma- nurese5
Outcome
available N, P and Ke5
Direction
significantly highere5
Qualifier
At the end of the 4 cropping cyclese5
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“At the end of the 4 cropping cycles, application of organic ma- nures resulted in significantly higher soil organic carbon, available N, P and K than chemical fertilizers but was on par with the integrated nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures were on par with integrated nutrient management for soil organic carbon, available N, P and K after four cropping cycles.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
organic ma- nurese5
Outcome
soil organic carbon, available N, P and Ke5
Direction
on par withe5
Comparator
integrated nutrient managemente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“At the end of the 4 cropping cycles, application of organic ma- nures resulted in significantly higher soil organic carbon, available N, P and K than chemical fertilizers but was on par with the integrated nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1500 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic returns were highest under INM and the soybean-durum wheat cropping system.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
INMe6
Outcome
Economic returnse6
Direction
higheste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e6

“Economic returns were the highest in the INM and soybean- du- rum wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic returns were similar between plots receiving organic manures and those receiving chemical fertilizers.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
organic manurese7
Outcome
Economic returnse6
Direction
similare7
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean (Glycine max) - based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–117 · show in text ↑
e6

“Economic returns were the highest in the INM and soybean- du- rum wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1589 · show in text ↑
e7

“they were similar between the treatments receiving organic manures and chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1685 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.