Paper · 2015 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effects of nitrogen rates on grain yield and nitrogen agronomic efficiency of durum wheat genotypes under different environments

S. Ayadi; C. Karmous; Z. Chamekh; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Durum wheat is an important staple food crop in Tunisia and other Mediterranean countries and is grown in various climatic conditions. Production and yield are however severely limited not only by drought events but also by reduced levels of nitrogen fertilisation. A study was carried out at two locations in the sub-humid area of Tunisia: Mateur in 2009–10 and 2010–11 and Beja in 2011–12 and 2012–13 under rainfed conditions. Four durum wheat genotypes (landraces: Bidi, Azizi; improved: Om Rabia, Khiar) were evaluated for nitrogen agronomic efficiency and related agronomic traits under various nitrogen rates: 0, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 kg N ha−1, with three replications. There was a significant interaction effect (P ≤ 0.001) environments × genotypes × N treatments for grain yield (GY), biomass yield (BY), harvest index (HI), partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFPN) and nitrogen agronomic use efficiencies (NAE). GY was the most affected trait by nitrogen applied showing an increase of 94% under high N treatment (250 kg N ha−1) compared to control plots without N treatments. A significant linear regression exists between GY (0 N) and GY for the different N rates (r = 0.70; P < 0.001). This effect was more pronounced for improved genotypes than landraces for all parameters excepting BY and NAEBY. BY showed +11% increase in landraces than improved genotypes. PFPN showed an average decrease of 65% under high-N fertilisation with 10% prevalence for improved genotypes. Landraces tend to promote vegetative growth while grain filling efficiency was higher for improved genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment, genotype and nitrogen treatment interacted significantly for grain yield.

Taxon
graine0
Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant interaction effect (P ≤ 0.001) environments × genotypes × N treatments for grain yield (GY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–796 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way interaction was significant for biomass yield.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
biomass yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant interaction effect (P ≤ 0.001) environments × genotypes × N treatments for grain yield (GY), biomass yield (BY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way interaction was significant for harvest index.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant interaction effect (P ≤ 0.001) environments × genotypes × N treatments for grain yield (GY), biomass yield (BY), harvest index (HI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way interaction was significant for partial factor productivity.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
partial factor productivity of applied nitrogene0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant interaction effect (P ≤ 0.001) environments × genotypes × N treatments for grain yield (GY), biomass yield (BY), harvest index (HI), partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way interaction was significant for nitrogen agronomic use efficiencies.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
nitrogen agronomic use efficienciese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant interaction effect (P ≤ 0.001) environments × genotypes × N treatments for grain yield (GY), biomass yield (BY), harvest index (HI), partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFPN) and nitrogen agronomic use efficiencies (NAE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen raised grain yield 94% relative to zero nitrogen.

Treatment
high N treatment (250 kg N ha−1)e0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
94%e0
Comparator
control plots without N treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GY was the most affected trait by nitrogen applied showing an increase of 94% under high N treatment (250 kg N ha−1) compared to control plots without N treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield at zero nitrogen had a significant linear relation to yield at other rates.

Outcome
GY for the different N ratese0
Value
r = 0.70e0
Comparator
GY (0 N)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant linear regression exists between GY (0 N) and GY for the different N rates (r = 0.70; P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen response was more pronounced in improved genotypes than landraces for most parameters, except biomass yield and NAEBY.

Material
improved genotypese0
Outcome
all parameters excepting BY and NAEBYe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
landracese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect was more pronounced for improved genotypes than landraces for all parameters excepting BY and NAEBY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landraces had 11% higher biomass yield than improved genotypes.

Material
landracese0
Outcome
BYe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
+11%e0
Comparator
improved genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BY showed +11% increase in landraces than improved genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial factor productivity fell by an average of 65% at high nitrogen fertilisation.

Treatment
high-N fertilisatione0
Outcome
PFPNe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PFPN showed an average decrease of 65% under high-N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved genotypes showed 10% prevalence in partial factor productivity.

Material
improved genotypese0
Outcome
PFPNe0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PFPN showed an average decrease of 65% under high-N fertilisation with 10% prevalence for improved genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landraces tended to promote vegetative growth.

Material
Landracese0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Landraces tend to promote vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain filling efficiency was higher for improved genotypes.

Material
improved genotypese0
Outcome
grain filling efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain filling efficiency was higher for improved genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.