Paper · 2019 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of irrigation levels and moisture conserving polymers on growth, productivity and profitability of wheat

SUDESH KUMAR; P K SHARMA; M R YADAV; et al.

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present field investigation was carried out during winter season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 at Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur to evaluate the effect of different irrigation levels and moisture conserving polymers on performance of wheat. Results revealed that application of six irrigations resulted in significantly maximum plant height (at harvest) and dry matter at 60, 90 DAS and harvest. The application of six irrigations enhanced the CGR by the magnitude of 55.97, 23.36 and 27.55% (30-60 DAS), 42.87, 20.38 and 20.70% (60-90 DAS) and 71.09, 48.00 and 49.53% (90 DAS-at harvest) over control, three irrigations (at fixed interval) and three irrigations (at critical stages), respectively. The application of Pusa hydrogel resulted in significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation and CGR during all the growth stages.The maximum number of earheads (375.78/ m2), spike length (10.82 cm), number of grains/ear (30.84) and test weight (40.95 g) were registered with application of six irrigations. Pusa hydrogel improved the effective tillers by 3.61-7.31% and spike length by 8.20-15.70% over control and Herbal hydrogel. The mean maximum grain (4.74 t/ha), straw (5.73 t/ha) and biological yield (10.47 t/ha) were recorded with application of six irrigations. Pusa and Herbal hydrogel enhanced the mean grain, straw and biological yield of wheat by 6.65-13.69%, 6.90-14.41% and 6.79-14.09%, respectively. The application of six irrigations increased gross and net returns by magnitude of 64.14, 31.35 and 33.28% and 83.35, 42.25 and 44.98% over control, three irrigation (at fixed interval) and three irrigation (at critical stages), respectively. The highest gross returns (` 76924/ha) net returns (` 45548/ha) were recorded with application of Pusa hydrogel. Therefore, application of Pusa hydrogel provided additional net returns of ` 5689/ha to the farmers over control. The application of Pusa hydrogel and six irrigations to wheat using sprinkler system can be advocated as sustainable strategy for enhancing productivity and profitability of wheat cultivation in semi-arid condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations maximized plant height and dry matter.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
plant height (at harvest) and dry mattere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of six irrigations resulted in significantly maximum plant height (at harvest) and dry matter at 60, 90 DAS and harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations enhanced crop growth rate across growth intervals.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control, three irrigations (at fixed interval) and three irrigations (at critical stages)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of six irrigations enhanced the CGR by the magnitude of 55.97, 23.36 and 27.55% (30-60 DAS), 42.87, 20.38 and 20.70% (60-90 DAS) and 71.09, 48.00 and 49.53% (90 DAS-at harvest) over control, three irrigations (at fixed interval) and three irrigations (at critical stages), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa hydrogel increased plant height, dry matter and crop growth rate.

Treatment
Pusa hydrogele0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation and CGRe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Pusa hydrogel resulted in significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation and CGR during all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations produced 375.78 earheads per square meter.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
number of earheadse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
375.78/ m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of earheads (375.78/ m2), spike length (10.82 cm), number of grains/ear (30.84) and test weight (40.95 g) were registered with application of six irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave spike length of 10.82 cm.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10.82 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of earheads (375.78/ m2), spike length (10.82 cm), number of grains/ear (30.84) and test weight (40.95 g) were registered with application of six irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 30.84 grains per ear.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
number of grains/eare0
Direction
maximume0
Value
30.84e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of earheads (375.78/ m2), spike length (10.82 cm), number of grains/ear (30.84) and test weight (40.95 g) were registered with application of six irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave test weight of 40.95 g.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40.95 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of earheads (375.78/ m2), spike length (10.82 cm), number of grains/ear (30.84) and test weight (40.95 g) were registered with application of six irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa hydrogel improved effective tillers by 3.61-7.31%.

Treatment
Pusa hydrogele0
Outcome
effective tillerse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
3.61-7.31%e0
Comparator
control and Herbal hydrogele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa hydrogel improved the effective tillers by 3.61-7.31% and spike length by 8.20-15.70% over control and Herbal hydrogel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa hydrogel improved spike length by 8.20-15.70%.

Treatment
Pusa hydrogele0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
8.20-15.70%e0
Comparator
control and Herbal hydrogele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa hydrogel improved the effective tillers by 3.61-7.31% and spike length by 8.20-15.70% over control and Herbal hydrogel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations maximized grain yield at 4.74 t/ha.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.74 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean maximum grain (4.74 t/ha), straw (5.73 t/ha) and biological yield (10.47 t/ha) were recorded with application of six irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations maximized straw yield at 5.73 t/ha.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.73 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean maximum grain (4.74 t/ha), straw (5.73 t/ha) and biological yield (10.47 t/ha) were recorded with application of six irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations maximized biological yield at 10.47 t/ha.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10.47 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean maximum grain (4.74 t/ha), straw (5.73 t/ha) and biological yield (10.47 t/ha) were recorded with application of six irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogels enhanced grain, straw and biological yield.

Treatment
Pusa and Herbal hydrogele0
Outcome
grain, straw and biological yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa and Herbal hydrogel enhanced the mean grain, straw and biological yield of wheat by 6.65-13.69%, 6.90-14.41% and 6.79-14.09%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations increased gross returns.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
grosse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control, three irrigation (at fixed interval) and three irrigation (at critical stages)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of six irrigations increased gross and net returns by magnitude of 64.14, 31.35 and 33.28% and 83.35, 42.25 and 44.98% over control, three irrigation (at fixed interval) and three irrigation (at critical stages), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations increased net returns.

Treatment
six irrigationse0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control, three irrigation (at fixed interval) and three irrigation (at critical stages)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of six irrigations increased gross and net returns by magnitude of 64.14, 31.35 and 33.28% and 83.35, 42.25 and 44.98% over control, three irrigation (at fixed interval) and three irrigation (at critical stages), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa hydrogel gave the highest gross returns of 76924/ha.

Treatment
Pusa hydrogele0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
` 76924/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross returns (` 76924/ha) net returns (` 45548/ha) were recorded with application of Pusa hydrogel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa hydrogel gave highest net returns of 45548/ha.

Treatment
Pusa hydrogele0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
` 45548/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross returns (` 76924/ha) net returns (` 45548/ha) were recorded with application of Pusa hydrogel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa hydrogel added 5689/ha net returns over control.

Treatment
Pusa hydrogele0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
additionale0
Value
` 5689/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Pusa hydrogel provided additional net returns of ` 5689/ha to the farmers over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1925 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advocate Pusa hydrogel and six irrigations by sprinkler for wheat in semi-arid conditions.

Outcome
application of Pusa hydrogel and six irrigations to wheat using sprinkler systeme0
Setting
semi-arid conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Pusa hydrogel and six irrigations to wheat using sprinkler system can be advocated as sustainable strategy for enhancing productivity and profitability of wheat cultivation in semi-arid condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–2141 · show in text ↑

693430 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

219 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.