Paper · 2024 · Current Research in Microbial Sciences

Genomic insights of a native bacterial consortium for wheat production sustainability

Marisol Ayala Zepeda; Valeria Valenzuela Ruiz; Fannie Isela Parra Cota; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The use of plant growth-promoting bacteria as bioinoculants is a powerful tool to increase crop yield and quality and to improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) from fertilizers in plants. This study aimed to bioprospecting a native bacterial consortium (Bacillus cabrialesii subsp. cabrialesii TE3T, Priestia megaterium TRQ8, and Bacillus paralicheniformis TRQ65), through bioinformatic analysis, and to quantify the impact of its inoculation on NUE (measured through 15N-isotopic techniques), grain yield, and grain quality of durum wheat variety CIRNO C2008 grown under three doses of urea (0, 120, and 240 kg N ha−1) during two consecutive agricultural cycles in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. The inoculation of the bacterial consortium (BC) to the wheat crop, at a total N concentration of 123-225 kg N ha−1 increased crop productivity and maintained grain quality, resulting in a yield increase of 1.1 ton ha−1 (6.0 vs. 7.1 ton ha−1, 0 kg N ha−1 added, 123 kg N ha−1 in the soil) and of 2.0 ton ha−1 (5.9 vs. 7.9 ton ha−1, 120 kg N ha−1 added, 104 kg N ha−1 in the soil) compared to the uninoculated controls at the same doses of N. The genomic bioinformatic analysis of the studied strains showed a great number of biofertilization-related genes regarding N and Fe acquisition, P assimilation, CO2 fixation, Fe, P, and K solubilization, with important roles in agroecosystems, as well as genes related to the production of siderophores and stress response. A positive effect of the BC on NUE at the studied initial N content (123 and 104 kg N ha−1) was not observed. Nevertheless, increases of 14% and 12.5% on NUE (whole plant) were observed when 120 kg N ha−1 was applied compared to when wheat was fully fertilized (240 kg N ha−1). This work represents a link between bioinformatic approaches of a native bacterial inoculant and the quantification of its impact on durum wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation raised wheat yield by 1.1 ton ha−1 without added N.

Treatment
inoculation of the bacterial consortium (BC)e0
Interactor
bacterial consortiume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.1 ton ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of the bacterial consortium (BC) to the wheat crop, at a total N concentration of 123-225 kg N ha−1 increased crop productivity and maintained grain quality, resulting in a yield increase of 1.1 ton ha−1 (6.0 vs. 7.1 ton ha−1, 0 kg N ha−1 added, 123 kg N ha−1 in the soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation raised wheat yield by 2.0 ton ha−1 with 120 kg N ha−1 added.

Treatment
inoculation of the bacterial consortium (BC)e0
Interactor
bacterial consortiume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.0 ton ha−1e0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of the bacterial consortium (BC) to the wheat crop, at a total N concentration of 123-225 kg N ha−1 increased crop productivity and maintained grain quality, resulting in a yield increase of 1.1 ton ha−1 (6.0 vs. 7.1 ton ha−1, 0 kg N ha−1 added, 123 kg N ha−1 in the soil) and of 2.0 ton ha−1 (5.9 vs. 7.9 ton ha−1, 120 kg N ha−1 added, 104 kg N ha−1 in the soil) compared to the uninoculated controls at the same doses of N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation maintained wheat grain quality.

Treatment
inoculation of the bacterial consortium (BC)e0
Interactor
bacterial consortiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of the bacterial consortium (BC) to the wheat crop, at a total N concentration of 123-225 kg N ha−1 increased crop productivity and maintained grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial strains had genes for nutrient acquisition, assimilation, fixation and solubilization, siderophores and stress response.

Gene
biofertilization-related genese0
Outcome
biofertilization-related genese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The genomic bioinformatic analysis of the studied strains showed a great number of biofertilization-related genes regarding N and Fe acquisition, P assimilation, CO2 fixation, Fe, P, and K solubilization, with important roles in agroecosystems, as well as genes related to the production of siderophores and stress response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A positive consortium effect on NUE at initial N levels of 123 and 104 kg N ha−1 was not observed.

Treatment
BCe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect of the BC on NUE at the studied initial N content (123 and 104 kg N ha−1) was not observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 120 kg N ha−1 rather than full fertilization, whole plant NUE increased by 14%.

Treatment
120 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
NUE (whole plant)e0
Direction
increasese0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
240 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases of 14% and 12.5% on NUE (whole plant) were observed when 120 kg N ha−1 was applied compared to when wheat was fully fertilized (240 kg N ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 120 kg N ha−1 rather than full fertilization, whole plant NUE increased by 12.5%.

Treatment
120 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
NUE (whole plant)e0
Direction
increasese0
Value
12.5%e0
Comparator
240 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases of 14% and 12.5% on NUE (whole plant) were observed when 120 kg N ha−1 was applied compared to when wheat was fully fertilized (240 kg N ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1735 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.