Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Micro-sprinkler irrigation with late and split N increased grain yield by 5.8% compared with border irrigation.

A claim from Can wheat yield, N use efficiency and processing quality be improved simultaneously? · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro-sprinkler irrigation with late and split N increased grain yield by 5.8% compared with border irrigation.

Treatment
MSI treatment with late and split application Ne1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5.8%e1
Comparator
conventional border irrigation (CBI)e0
Setting
field and isotope micro-plot experimentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Can wheat yield, N use efficiency and processing quality be improved simultaneously?”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84
e1

“MSI treatment with late and split application N increased grain yield, protein concentration, post-anthesis nitrogen accumulation amount and fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency by 5.8%, 8.6%, 42.5% and 15.8%, respectively, compared with CBI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–655
e0

“compared under micro-sprinkler irrigation (MSI) and conventional border irrigation (CBI) treatments by field and isotope micro-plot experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–376

Title

Can wheat yield, N use efficiency and processing quality be improved simultaneously?

Chunsheng Yao; Jie Ren; Haoran Li; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108006

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-de20fc1449a66d5355db9559e9bd22416a82917087bafed22b71e5fa03510f84 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.