Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Weed management in direct wet seeded rice

S. Rathika; T. Ramesh

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute, Aduthurai during Kuruvai season 2013 to evaluate the weed management practices in direct wet seeded rice. The weed management practices were : Pre-emergence (PE) pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha on 3 DAS fb Early post-emergence (EPOE) metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl at 4 g/ha on 25 DAS, PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha on 3 DAS fb EPOE bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha on 25 DAS, PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb cono weeder weeding on 25 DAS, PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb drum type weeder weeding on 25 DAS compared with recommended practice of PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg ha-1 fb hand weeding on 40 DAS, hand weeding on 20 and 45 DAS and unweeded control. The results revealed that the lowest total weed density, total weed dry weight and higher weed control efficency, yield parameters and yield of rice were recorded in hand weeding on 20 and 45 DAS and it was followed by PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb hand weeding on 40 DAS and PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb EPOE metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl at 4 g/ha on 25 DAS. However, the net returns and BC ratio were higher in PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb EPOE metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl at 4 g/ha on 25 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding on 20 and 45 DAS produced the lowest weed density and dry weight and highest weed control efficiency.

Treatment
hand weeding on 20 and 45 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed density, total weed dry weight and higher weed control efficencye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest total weed density, total weed dry weight and higher weed control efficency, yield parameters and yield of rice were recorded in hand weeding on 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding on 20 and 45 DAS produced higher rice yield parameters and yield.

Treatment
hand weeding on 20 and 45 DASe0
Outcome
yield parameters and yield of ricee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher weed control efficency, yield parameters and yield of rice were recorded in hand weeding on 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor followed by hand weeding ranked next for weed control and rice yield.

Treatment
PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb hand weeding on 40 DASe0
Outcome
it was followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was followed by PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb hand weeding on 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor followed by metsulfuron methyl plus chlorimuron ethyl ranked after the hand-weeding regimes.

Outcome
PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb EPOE metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl at 4 g/ha on 25 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb EPOE metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl at 4 g/ha on 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor followed by metsulfuron methyl plus chlorimuron ethyl gave higher net returns and BC ratio.

Treatment
PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb EPOE metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl at 4 g/ha on 25 DASe0
Outcome
net returns and BC ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns and BC ratio were higher in PE pretilachlor + safener at 0.45 kg/ha fb EPOE metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl at 4 g/ha on 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

methyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

chlorimuron-ethyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 30 positive, 12 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.