Abstract
The present investigation entitled “Influence of exogenous application of Sulphur, Gibberellic acid and NAA on yield and quality of Kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) c.v N - 53” was carried out during kharif 2016 – 17 (first year), 2017 – 18 (second year) and in pooled at the Experimental field RVSKVV, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Rajgarh (M.P.) with 27 treatment combinations of three levels of sulphur i.e. 0, 20 and 40 kgha-1, three levels of Gibberellic acid viz., 0, 50 and 100 ppm and three levels of NAA i.e. 0, 50 and 100 ppm. Results revealed that the application of 40 kg S ha-1 recorded significantly maximum quality marketable bulb percent (97.24), moisture content (87.26)percent, TSS (13.46) percent, fresh weight of bulb (93.69) and bulb yield (242.16) q per hactare whereas, splitted bulb percent was noted minimum in this treatment as compared to control. Foliar application of GA3 @ 50ppm (G1) and NAA @ 100 PPM (N2) exhibited significantly highest marketable bulb per cent, moisture content percent, TSS percent,fresh weight of bulb and bulb yield per hectare while, splitted bulb percent was noted minimum in this treatment as compared to control. Interaction effect was also observed same trend. The cost benefit ratio 1: 3.67 was found maximum with the application of S 40 Kg/ha+ GA3 50 ppm + NAA100 ppm (S2G1N2) it also recorded maximum bulb yield of 290.18 q ha-1 and net return of Rs 2,11,139 ha-1 in onion variety N - 53. From the study it can be concluded that various yield and quality and parameters were improved with the application of S 40 Kg/ha+ GA3 50 ppm + NAA 100ppm and it was economically viable and treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 40 kg per hectare maximized marketable bulb percent at 97.24.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- 40 kg S ha-1e0
- Outcome
- marketable bulb percente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 97.24e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 40 kg S ha-1 recorded significantly maximum quality marketable bulb percent (97.24)”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 40 kg per hectare maximized bulb moisture content at 87.26 percent.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 40 kg S ha-1e0
- Outcome
- moisture contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 87.26e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 40 kg S ha-1 recorded significantly maximum quality marketable bulb percent (97.24), moisture content (87.26)percent”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 40 kg per hectare maximized bulb TSS at 13.46 percent.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 40 kg S ha-1 recorded significantly maximum quality marketable bulb percent (97.24), moisture content (87.26)percent, TSS (13.46) percent”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 40 kg per hectare maximized fresh bulb weight at 93.69.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 40 kg S ha-1e0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of bulbe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 93.69e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 40 kg S ha-1 recorded significantly maximum quality marketable bulb percent (97.24), moisture content (87.26)percent, TSS (13.46) percent, fresh weight of bulb (93.69)”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 40 kg per hectare maximized bulb yield at 242.16 q per hectare.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 40 kg S ha-1e0
- Outcome
- bulb yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 242.16e0
- Qualifier
- q per hactaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 40 kg S ha-1 recorded significantly maximum quality marketable bulb percent (97.24), moisture content (87.26)percent, TSS (13.46) percent, fresh weight of bulb (93.69) and bulb yield (242.16) q per hactare”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 40 kg per hectare minimized split bulbs versus control.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 40 kg S ha-1e0
- Outcome
- splitted bulb percente0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 40 kg S ha-1 recorded significantly maximum quality marketable bulb percent (97.24), moisture content (87.26)percent, TSS (13.46) percent, fresh weight of bulb (93.69) and bulb yield (242.16) q per hactare whereas, splitted bulb percent was noted minimum in this treatment as compared to control”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 50 ppm raised marketable bulb percent, moisture, TSS, bulb weight and yield versus control.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- GA3 @ 50ppme0
- Outcome
- marketable bulb per cent, moisture content percent, TSS percente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of GA3 @ 50ppm (G1) and NAA @ 100 PPM (N2) exhibited significantly highest marketable bulb per cent, moisture content percent, TSS percent,fresh weight of bulb and bulb yield per hectare while, splitted bulb percent was noted minimum in this treatment as compared to control”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
NAA at 100 ppm gave the highest bulb quality metrics and yield.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- NAA @ 100 PPMe0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of bulb and bulb yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of GA3 @ 50ppm (G1) and NAA @ 100 PPM (N2) exhibited significantly highest marketable bulb per cent, moisture content percent, TSS percent,fresh weight of bulb and bulb yield per hectare”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
The GA3 and NAA applications minimized split bulbs versus control.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Outcome
- splitted bulb percente0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while, splitted bulb percent was noted minimum in this treatment as compared to control”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined sulphur, GA3 and NAA treatment maximized the cost benefit ratio at 1:3.67.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- S 40 Kg/ha+ GA3 50 ppm + NAA100 ppme0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1: 3.67e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cost benefit ratio 1: 3.67 was found maximum with the application of S 40 Kg/ha+ GA3 50 ppm + NAA100 ppm (S2G1N2)”
t0“onion”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave maximum bulb yield of 290.18 q ha-1.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it also recorded maximum bulb yield of 290.18 q ha-1 and net return of Rs 2,11,139 ha-1 in onion variety N - 53”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave a net return of Rs 2,11,139 ha-1.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepae0
- Material
- N - 53e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- Rs 2,11,139 ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net return of Rs 2,11,139 ha-1 in onion variety N - 53”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.