Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Assessment the effect of sulphur dose on onion (Allium Cepa) in Koshi region

RK Verma; SP Viaskarma; Shivam Singh; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Onion has high demand for the sulphur which affects the Bulb Quality and Productivity but it should be applied in the field carefully so, as it produces acidic effects and adversely affects the plant. The present on farm trial was carried out to study the effect of Sulphur application on the yield and its attributes at 8 farmers field of Madhepura district under supervision of Krishi Vigyan Kendra Madhepura, Bihar Agriculture University, Sabour in Rabi Season from October- 2018 to April - 2019. It was arranged in Randomized Block Design with 3 treatments and 5 replications. Yield attributes for all treatments are significant except neck thickness and neck diameter. Maximum Yield (295q/ha), bulb size (5.56cm), neck thickness (5.8cm) Plant height (51.6cm), Number of leaves (8.3) and length of leaf (39.9cm) were recorded from the doze of 30 kg Sulphur per hectare. Economically, highest net monitory return of Rs. 132494 per hectare was obtained with the application of Sulphur @30 kg/ha. The application of Sulphur at this rate had been found to be non tedious, economically feasible and more convenient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur treatments significantly affected yield attributes except neck thickness and diameter.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Yield attributese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield attributes for all treatments are significant except neck thickness and neck diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion yield was maximal at 295q/ha under 30 kg sulphur per hectare.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
30 kg Sulphur per hectaree0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
295q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum Yield (295q/ha), bulb size (5.56cm), neck thickness (5.8cm) Plant height (51.6cm), Number of leaves (8.3) and length of leaf (39.9cm) were recorded from the doze of 30 kg Sulphur per hectare.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb size reached 5.56cm at that sulphur dose.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
30 kg Sulphur per hectaree0
Outcome
bulb sizee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
5.56cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum Yield (295q/ha), bulb size (5.56cm), neck thickness (5.8cm) Plant height (51.6cm), Number of leaves (8.3) and length of leaf (39.9cm) were recorded from the doze of 30 kg Sulphur per hectare.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neck thickness reached 5.8cm at that sulphur dose.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
30 kg Sulphur per hectaree0
Outcome
neck thicknesse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
5.8cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum Yield (295q/ha), bulb size (5.56cm), neck thickness (5.8cm) Plant height (51.6cm), Number of leaves (8.3) and length of leaf (39.9cm) were recorded from the doze of 30 kg Sulphur per hectare.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height reached 51.6cm at that sulphur dose.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
30 kg Sulphur per hectaree0
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
51.6cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum Yield (295q/ha), bulb size (5.56cm), neck thickness (5.8cm) Plant height (51.6cm), Number of leaves (8.3) and length of leaf (39.9cm) were recorded from the doze of 30 kg Sulphur per hectare.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of leaves reached 8.3 at that sulphur dose.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
30 kg Sulphur per hectaree0
Outcome
Number of leavese0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
8.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum Yield (295q/ha), bulb size (5.56cm), neck thickness (5.8cm) Plant height (51.6cm), Number of leaves (8.3) and length of leaf (39.9cm) were recorded from the doze of 30 kg Sulphur per hectare.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf length reached 39.9cm at that sulphur dose.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
30 kg Sulphur per hectaree0
Outcome
length of leafe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
39.9cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum Yield (295q/ha), bulb size (5.56cm), neck thickness (5.8cm) Plant height (51.6cm), Number of leaves (8.3) and length of leaf (39.9cm) were recorded from the doze of 30 kg Sulphur per hectare.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of Sulphur @30 kg/ha gave the highest net monetary return, Rs. 132494 per hectare.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Sulphur @30 kg/hae0
Outcome
net monitory returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 132494 per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest net monitory return of Rs. 132494 per hectare was obtained with the application of Sulphur @30 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–996 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found that sulphur application at that rate was feasible and convenient.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Sulphur at this ratee0
Outcome
non tedious, economically feasible and more conveniente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium Cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of Sulphur at this rate had been found to be non tedious, economically feasible and more convenient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1114 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.