Paper · 2016 · HortScience

Sweet Onion (Allium cepa) Plant Growth and Bulb Yield and Quality as Affected by Potassium and Sulfur Fertilization Rates

Juan Carlos Díaz-Pérez; Jesús Bautista; Anthony Bateman; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

‘Vidalia’ onions are sweet, short day, low pungency, yellow Granex-type bulbs that are popular in the United States. The relationships of sweet onion bulb yield and quality with potassium (K) and sulfur (S) concentrations are not fully understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of K and S fertilization rates on sweet onion plant growth and bulb yield and quality. Experiments were conducted at the Horticulture Farm, Tifton Campus, University of Georgia, in the Winters of 2012–13 and 2013–14. The experiment had five treatments (K/S rates: 56/80, 112/126, 168/172, 224/218, and 280/264 kg·ha −1 of K and S, respectively). K/S rates had no effect on onion biomass of roots, bulbs, and shoots during the growing season. Marketable and total number and weight of onion bulbs and individual bulb weight were also unaffected by K/S rate. Incidences of bolting, double bulbs, Botrytis leaf blight ( Botrytis cinerea ), and sour skin ( Burkholderia cepacia ), and bulb dry weight, soluble solids content (SSC), and pungency (pyruvate concentration) were unaffected by K/S rates. In conclusion, K/S rates had little effect on plant growth and bulb yield and quality. The lack of response of onion plants to K/S rates, even at the lowest rate suggests that some of the K absorbed by plants originated from K already present in the soil before planting. The average K content of sweet onion whole plants was 80 kg·ha −1 K. Thus, under our experimental conditions, application of K rates above the recommended value (84 kg·ha −1 K) are unnecessary and will likely not improve plant growth, yield, or quality. Regarding S, rates higher than 80 kg·ha −1 S are probably unnecessary and will not enhance either plant growth or bulb yield or quality of sweet onion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/S fertilization rates had no effect on onion biomass of roots, bulbs and shoots during the growing season.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Organ / stage
roots, bulbs, and shootse1
Treatment
K/S ratese1
Outcome
onion biomass of roots, bulbs, and shootse1
Direction
no effecte1
Qualifier
during the growing seasone1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Tifton Campus, University of Georgiae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“K/S rates had no effect on onion biomass of roots, bulbs, and shoots during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–744 · show in text ↑
e4

“Experiments were conducted at the Horticulture Farm, Tifton Campus, University of Georgia, in the Winters of 2012–13 and 2013–14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/S rate did not affect the marketable and total number and weight of onion bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
K/S ratee2
Outcome
Marketable and total number and weight of onion bulbse2
Direction
unaffectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marketable and total number and weight of onion bulbs and individual bulb weight were also unaffected by K/S rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/S rate did not affect individual bulb weight.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
K/S ratee2
Outcome
individual bulb weighte2
Direction
unaffectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marketable and total number and weight of onion bulbs and individual bulb weight were also unaffected by K/S rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/S rates did not affect incidences of bolting and double bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
K/S ratese3
Outcome
Incidences of bolting, double bulbse3
Direction
unaffectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e3

“Incidences of bolting, double bulbs, Botrytis leaf blight ( Botrytis cinerea ), and sour skin ( Burkholderia cepacia ), and bulb dry weight, soluble solids content (SSC), and pungency (pyruvate concentration) were unaffected by K/S rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/S rates did not affect incidence of Botrytis leaf blight caused by Botrytis cinerea.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
K/S ratese3
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae3pathogen
Outcome
Botrytis leaf blighte3
Direction
unaffectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e3

“Incidences of bolting, double bulbs, Botrytis leaf blight ( Botrytis cinerea ), and sour skin ( Burkholderia cepacia ), and bulb dry weight, soluble solids content (SSC), and pungency (pyruvate concentration) were unaffected by K/S rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/S rates did not affect incidence of sour skin caused by Burkholderia cepacia.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
K/S ratese3
Interactor
Burkholderia cepaciaBurkholderia cepaciae3pathogen
Outcome
sour skine3
Direction
unaffectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia cepacia
Burkholderia cepacia · InteractorPhoto Credit: CDC/Janice Carr Content Providers: CDC/Janice Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e3

“Incidences of bolting, double bulbs, Botrytis leaf blight ( Botrytis cinerea ), and sour skin ( Burkholderia cepacia ), and bulb dry weight, soluble solids content (SSC), and pungency (pyruvate concentration) were unaffected by K/S rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/S rates did not affect bulb dry weight, soluble solids content and pungency.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
K/S ratese3
Outcome
bulb dry weight, soluble solids content (SSC), and pungencye3
Direction
unaffectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e3

“Incidences of bolting, double bulbs, Botrytis leaf blight ( Botrytis cinerea ), and sour skin ( Burkholderia cepacia ), and bulb dry weight, soluble solids content (SSC), and pungency (pyruvate concentration) were unaffected by K/S rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average K content of sweet onion whole plants was 80 kg/ha K.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Outcome
average K content of sweet onion whole plantse5
Value
80 kg·ha −1 Ke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e5

“The average K content of sweet onion whole plants was 80 kg·ha −1 K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1439 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of K rates above the recommended value (84 kg/ha K) is unnecessary and will likely not improve plant growth, yield or quality.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Outcome
application of K rates above the recommended valuee6
Value
84 kg·ha −1 Ke6
Qualifier
will likely not improve plant growth, yield, or qualitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e6

“application of K rates above the recommended value (84 kg·ha −1 K) are unnecessary and will likely not improve plant growth, yield, or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1624 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur rates higher than 80 kg/ha are probably unnecessary and will not enhance plant growth, bulb yield or quality.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Outcome
rates higher than 80 kg·ha −1 Se7
Value
80 kg·ha −1 Se7
Qualifier
will not enhance either plant growth or bulb yield or quality of sweet onione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e7

“rates higher than 80 kg·ha −1 S are probably unnecessary and will not enhance either plant growth or bulb yield or quality of sweet onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1776 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.