Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Marketable yield of onion was highest (20.8 ha-1) at 105:119.6:22 kg ha-1 N:P2O5:S in the Adama Red variety.

A claim from Optimum rate of NPS fertilizer for economical production of irrigated onion (Allium cepa L) in Dembyia District of Amhara Region, Ethiopia · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yield of onion was highest (20.8 ha-1) at 105:119.6:22 kg ha-1 N:P2O5:S in the Adama Red variety.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae4
Material
Adama Rede5
Treatment
105:119.6:22 kg ha-1 N:P2O5:S fertilizer ratee4
Outcome
marketable yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
20.8 ha-1e4

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Onion plants supplied with 105:119.6:22 kg ha-1 N:P2O5:S fertilizer rate gave the highest mean bulb weight (198.8 g), marketable yield (20.8 ha-1) and total bulb yield (21.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1339
e5

“where maximum yield of Adama Red onion variety can be obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–755

Title

Optimum rate of NPS fertilizer for economical production of irrigated onion (Allium cepa L) in Dembyia District of Amhara Region, Ethiopia

Muluneh Nigatu; Melkamu Alemayehu; Amare Haile Sellassie Ethiopian Journal of Science and Technology 2019. doi:10.4314/ejst.v11i2.3

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2ddfd424b56f48560f0c8dea52a80941e0179fb3b3c4c43b0a255e441b0eb63b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

phosphorus · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.