Paper · 2017 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of Glomus macrocarpum and fluorescent pseudomonads on Enzyme activity in chilli rhizosphere

Ramesha; VP Savalgi

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The fluorescent pseudomonads and AM fungi are known to produce certain plant metabolites, plant growth promoting substances, vitamins etc. The mutual interactions of inoculated organisms is responsible for the increased enzyme activity in rhizosphere. A green house study was carried out at university of agricultural sciences Dharwad where co-inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizo-microorganisms and AM fungi have enhanced enzyme activity in rhizosphere with increased growth and yield of chilli. The treatment incoculated with Glomus macrocarpum and fluorescent pseudomonads with 50% rock phosphate had shown increased phosphatase and dehydrogenase enzyme activity which was recorded at flowering and harvesting stages respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation enhanced rhizosphere enzyme activity, chilli growth and yield.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
co-inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizo-microorganisms and AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
enzyme activity in rhizosphere with increased growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizo-microorganisms and AM fungi have enhanced enzyme activity in rhizosphere with increased growth and yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus macrocarpum and fluorescent pseudomonads with 50% rock phosphate increased phosphatase activity at flowering.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
floweringe0
Treatment
Glomus macrocarpum and fluorescent pseudomonads with 50% rock phosphatee0
Interactor
Glomus macrocarpumGlomus macrocarpume0symbiont
Second interactor
fluorescent pseudomonadsPseudomonas fluorescens groupe0symbiont
Outcome
phosphatasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glomus macrocarpum
Glomus macrocarpum · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus macrocarpum and fluorescent pseudomonads with 50% rock phosphate had shown increased phosphatase and dehydrogenase enzyme activity which was recorded at flowering and harvesting stages respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment increased dehydrogenase activity at harvest.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
harvesting stagese0
Treatment
Glomus macrocarpum and fluorescent pseudomonads with 50% rock phosphatee0
Interactor
Glomus macrocarpumGlomus macrocarpume0symbiont
Second interactor
fluorescent pseudomonadsPseudomonas fluorescens groupe0symbiont
Outcome
dehydrogenase enzyme activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glomus macrocarpum
Glomus macrocarpum · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus macrocarpum and fluorescent pseudomonads with 50% rock phosphate had shown increased phosphatase and dehydrogenase enzyme activity which was recorded at flowering and harvesting stages respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.