Paper · 1970 · Bangladesh Journal of Microbiology

Effect of Different Sources of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza on the Performance of Chilli Seedlings

M Abdus Satter; Delowara Khanam

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of different sources of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on chilli seedlings was conducted in the net house of Soil Science Division, BARI, Gazipur. The AM fungi from various sources including an exotic variety were included in this study. Soil-based AM inoculum was used at the rate of 50 g/pot. It was found that the growth, biomass yield and nutrient uptake of inoculated seedlings were significantly higher than those of uninoculated seedlings. Such higher growth and nutrient uptake appeared to be due to beneficial effects of AM fungi. The performance of the indigenous AM inocula was much better than the exotic inoculum with respect to biomass production and nutrient uptake. Inoculation with AM fungi helped to produce healthy and vigorous seedlings with faster growth. This would help reducing the nursery life and thereby reduce the cost of seedling production. It is expected that the AM inoculated seedlings might perform better in the field trail since the fungi could colonize with the roots.Keywords: Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Chilli seedlings, Pot cultureDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v23i2.870 Bangladesh J Microbiol, Volume 23, Number 2, December 2006, pp 98-101

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with indigenous or exotic AM fungi significantly increased growth, biomass yield and nutrient uptake of chilli seedlings compared with uninoculated seedlings.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Soil-based AM inoculume1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae2symbiont
Outcome
growth, biomass yield and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
uninoculated seedlingse0

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“growth, biomass yield and nutrient uptake of inoculated seedlings were significantly higher than those of uninoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil-based AM inoculum was used at the rate of 50 g/pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–307 · show in text ↑
e2

“The AM fungi from various sources including an exotic variety were included in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous AM inocula gave much better biomass production and nutrient uptake in chilli seedlings than the exotic inoculum.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
indigenous AM inoculae3
Interactor
AM inoculae3symbiont
Outcome
biomass production and nutrient uptakee3
Direction
much bettere3
Comparator
exotic inoculume3

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e3

“The performance of the indigenous AM inocula was much better than the exotic inoculum with respect to biomass production and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with AM fungi produced healthy and vigorous chilli seedlings with faster growth.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Inoculation with AM fungie4
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae4symbiont
Outcome
healthy and vigorous seedlingse4
Direction
fastere4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inoculation with AM fungi helped to produce healthy and vigorous seedlings with faster growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–789 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect AM inoculation to reduce chilli nursery time and seedling production cost.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
reducing the nursery lifee5

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e5

“This would help reducing the nursery life and thereby reduce the cost of seedling production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–883 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.