Paper · 2020 · International Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology

The Use of Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum) A Liquid Bio-Fertilizer Along with Chemical Fertilizer on Crop Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)

Sandeepa Kanitkar; V. M. Raut; Medha Kulkarni; et al.

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) is widely cultivated as a staple food crop of the world as well as in India. However, due to continuous use of chemical fertilizers the productivity is decreasing. Hence an experiment was conducted to study the effect of Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum) alongwith RDF at Agronomy Division, I.A.R.I. New Delhi. Results compiled indicated that application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF. Similarly, foliar nitrogen nutrition by Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum) can reduce 25 % nitrogen dose and increase yield by 47.02 % to 61.02 % over control and on par results with RDF.Also, spraying of Vitormone did not show any phyto-toxic effect on wheat plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased wheat tillers per square metre by 49.17% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
tillers/m2e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
49.17%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased productive tillers by 56.50% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
productive tillers/m2e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
56.50%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased ear length by 32.18% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
ear lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.18%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased spikelets per ear by 25.86% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
spikelets/eare0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25.86%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased grains per spikelet by 29.72% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
grains/spikelete0
Direction
increasee0
Value
29.72%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased straw yield by 53.77% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
53.77%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased thousand grain weight by 21.80% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.80%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased wheat protein content by 20.62% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.62%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased wheat yield by 78.10% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
78.10%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone with RDF increased wheat yield by 8.57% over RDF.

Treatment
Vitormonee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8.57%e0
Comparator
RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Vitormone @ 2.0 ml/L alongwith RDF significantly increase tillers/m2 (49.17%), productive tillers/m2 (56.50%), ear length (32.18%), spikelets/ear (25.86%), grains/spikelet (29.72%), straw yield (53.77%), 1000 grain weight (21.80%), protein content (20.62%) and yield (78.10%) over control and 8.57% over RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Vitormone permitted a 25% reduction in nitrogen dose.

Treatment
Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum)e0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen dosee0
Direction
reducee0
Value
25 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar nitrogen nutrition by Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum) can reduce 25 % nitrogen dose and increase yield by 47.02 % to 61.02 % over control and on par results with RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Vitormone increased wheat yield by 47.02% to 61.02% over control.

Treatment
Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum)e0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
47.02 % to 61.02 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar nitrogen nutrition by Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum) can reduce 25 % nitrogen dose and increase yield by 47.02 % to 61.02 % over control and on par results with RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Vitormone gave yield comparable to RDF.

Treatment
Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum)e0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar nitrogen nutrition by Vitormone (Azotobacter chroococcum) can reduce 25 % nitrogen dose and increase yield by 47.02 % to 61.02 % over control and on par results with RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–885 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitormone spraying showed no phytotoxicity in wheat.

Treatment
spraying of Vitormonee0
Outcome
did not show any phyto-toxic effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of Vitormone did not show any phyto-toxic effect on wheat plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–964 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter chroococcum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.