Abstract
The field experiment was carried out at Department of Soil Science, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad, India during kharif season of 2015-16. The experiment was laid out in 3×3 factorial randomized block design with 9 treatments in three replications. It indicates that application of NPK, Zinc, FYM and Azotobacter increased the total cost of cultivation of yellow mustard markedly. The maximum total cost of cultivation (` 39290.92 ha−1) and the maximum net return (` 56259.08 ha−1) was computed in T8 (N:P:K:Zn 120:60:60:20 kg ha-1 + FYM 10 t ha-1: Azotobacter 200 gm/10kg seed). while the maximum net return `−1 invested (2.85) was recorded inT6 (N:P:K:Zn 120:60:60:20 kg ha-1 + FYM 0 t ha-1: Azotobacter 0 gm/10kg seed).There should be a chance of better yield and net income, suggested all operations will be performing timely for this crop, because time is a very important factor and play great role for greater yield and its quality, before time or after time any operations in the field of agriculture production and quality will goes down.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, zinc, FYM and Azotobacter increased cultivation cost of yellow mustard.
- Taxon
- yellow mustard
Sinapis albae0 - Treatment
- NPK, Zinc, FYM and Azotobactere0
- Outcome
- total cost of cultivatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of NPK, Zinc, FYM and Azotobacter increased the total cost of cultivation of yellow mustard markedly”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had maximum total cultivation cost of 39290.92 per hectare.
Not reportedTaxonMaterial
Verbatim
e0“The maximum total cost of cultivation (` 39290.92 ha−1) and the maximum net return (` 56259.08 ha−1) was computed in T8 (N:P:K:Zn 120:60:60:20 kg ha-1 + FYM 10 t ha-1: Azotobacter 200 gm/10kg seed).”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had maximum net return of 56259.08 per hectare.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The maximum total cost of cultivation (` 39290.92 ha−1) and the maximum net return (` 56259.08 ha−1) was computed in T8 (N:P:K:Zn 120:60:60:20 kg ha-1 + FYM 10 t ha-1: Azotobacter 200 gm/10kg seed).”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had maximum net return per unit invested of 2.85.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the maximum net return `−1 invested (2.85) was recorded inT6 (N:P:K:Zn 120:60:60:20 kg ha-1 + FYM 0 t ha-1: Azotobacter 0 gm/10kg seed)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.