Paper · 2020 · South African Journal of Botany

Comparative growth responses of Amaranthus [L.] species in Humus and Ferruginous Ultisols using plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (Pseudomonas species)

Beckley Ikhajiagbe; Matthew Chidozie Ogwu; Funmilayo Oluwaseun Fawehinmi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study investigated the possibility of growth-promoting rhizobacteria to enhance plant growth capacities of Amaranthus hybridus and A. viridis in ferruginous ultisols comparative to humus. The experimental setup was divided into two groups; the first comprised of 2 weeks old plants that were inoculated using the rhizobacteria – Pseudomonas putida, P. fluorescence and a combination of both in the ratio of 1:1, in both humus (HMS) and ferruginous red (FRS) soils. The second consisted of seeds of the test plants bioprimed with the bacteria in filtrates of HMS and FRS respectively. Germination percentage in the Pseudomonas-exposed seeds was better when seeds were primed for 24 h than for 3 h in both plant species. Further, results showed that plants sown in the ferruginous soil were short-lived compared to those sown in humus containing soil irrespective of microbial treatments. The growth parameters of plants inoculated with the Pseudomonas species were better than the uninoculated plants and plants sown in the humus soil. Qualitative assessment of phytochemicals showed the presence of saponins, phenolic, tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids, and flavonoids in both species notwithstanding inoculation. The presence of glycosides in plants inoculated with P. pseudomonas was reported, but not in the control plants. Significant reduction in total phenols upon inoculation of plants with P. putida was also reported. Following the failure of FRS-exposed plants to subsist, in-vitro growth studies were conducted to compare seed growth response. Results suggest that seeds sown in FRS-filtrates performed better than those in HMS-filtrates. Pseudomonas species improves the growth, development and stress tolerance of Amaranthus species in humus soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination percentage of Pseudomonas-exposed Amaranthus seeds was better with 24 h priming than with 3 h priming in both species.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthust0
Treatment
primed for 24 he0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
Germination percentagee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
for 3 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination percentage in the Pseudomonas-exposed seeds was better when seeds were primed for 24 h than for 3 h in both plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus plants in ferruginous soil were short-lived compared with those in humus soil regardless of microbial treatment.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthust0
Treatment
ferruginous soile0
Outcome
short-livede0
Direction
short-livede0
Comparator
humus containing soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants sown in the ferruginous soil were short-lived compared to those sown in humus containing soil irrespective of microbial treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth parameters of Amaranthus inoculated with Pseudomonas were better than those of uninoculated plants and plants in humus soil.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthust0
Treatment
inoculated with the Pseudomonas speciese0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The growth parameters of plants inoculated with the Pseudomonas species were better than the uninoculated plants and plants sown in the humus soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1037 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saponins, phenolics, tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids and flavonoids were present in both Amaranthus species regardless of inoculation.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthust0
Outcome
presence of saponins, phenolic, tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids, and flavonoidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Qualitative assessment of phytochemicals showed the presence of saponins, phenolic, tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids, and flavonoids in both species notwithstanding inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycosides were present in plants inoculated with P. pseudomonas but not in control plants.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthust0
Treatment
inoculated with P. pseudomonase0
Interactor
P. pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
presence of glycosidese0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The presence of glycosides in plants inoculated with P. pseudomonas was reported, but not in the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. putida significantly reduced total phenols.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthust0
Treatment
inoculation of plants with P. putidae0
Interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
total phenolse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant reduction in total phenols upon inoculation of plants with P. putida was also reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In in-vitro growth studies, seeds sown in FRS-filtrates performed better than those in HMS-filtrates.

Taxon
AmaranthusAmaranthust0
Treatment
seeds sown in FRS-filtratese0
Outcome
performede0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
those in HMS-filtratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results suggest that seeds sown in FRS-filtrates performed better than those in HMS-filtrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas species improve the growth, development and stress tolerance of Amaranthus species in humus soil.

Taxon
Amaranthus speciesAmaranthuse0
Treatment
Pseudomonas speciese0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
growth, development and stress tolerancee0
Direction
improvese0
Setting
humus soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Amaranthus [L.] species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pseudomonas species improves the growth, development and stress tolerance of Amaranthus species in humus soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1760 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · AmaranthusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.