Paper · 2020 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani (Kühn) and Fusarium solani (Marti) causing damping-off disease in tomato with Azotobacter chroococcum and Pseudomonas fluorescens

Ali A Alsudani; Ghaidaa Raheem Lat

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Damping-off disease is one of the most reasons for low productively of tomato in the world, especially in Iraq. In the current study, two types of bacteria (Azotobacter chroococcum and Pseudomonas fluorescens) were used to evaluate their efficacy in inhibiting the growth of pathogenic fungi Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium solani and protecting the seeds of tomato and increasing their germination percentage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dual culture technique and Food poisoning technique were used to study the effect of bacteria on the growth of fungi understudy, and study the effect of bacterial filtrates on germination of tomato seeds. RESULTS: A. chroococcum showed the strongest antagonistic activity followed by P. fluorescens with the percentage of inhibition ranging between 72.9-77.1 and 69.5-70.3% for R. solani and F. solani respectively after 7 days of incubation. The effect of A. chroococcum and P. fluorescens filtrates were increased and also increased the inhibition of growth of fungi understudy, A. chroococcum filtrate also showed the strongest inhibitory effect followed by P. fluorescens with the percentage of inhibition ranging between 86.0-87.0 and 83.0-83.5% for R. solani and F. solani respectively at 20% concentration of filtrate. The percentage of seeds germination reached 90% in the treatment of A. chroococcum filtrate and 80% in the treatment of P. fluorescens filtrate. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the filtrates of A. chroococcum and P. fluorescens have antifungal properties against R. solani and F. solani and provided a high protection and increasing tomato seeds germination percentage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum inhibited growth of R. solani and F. solani by 72.9–77.1%.

Treatment
A. chroococcume0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
A. chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
strongeste0
Value
72.9-77.1e0
Comparator
P. fluorescense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“A. chroococcum showed the strongest antagonistic activity followed by P. fluorescens with the percentage of inhibition ranging between 72.9-77.1 and 69.5-70.3% for R. solani and F. solani respectively after 7 days of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens inhibited growth of R. solani and F. solani by 69.5–70.3%.

Treatment
P. fluorescense0
Interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
69.5-70.3%e0
Comparator
A. chroococcume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“A. chroococcum showed the strongest antagonistic activity followed by P. fluorescens with the percentage of inhibition ranging between 72.9-77.1 and 69.5-70.3% for R. solani and F. solani respectively after 7 days of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter filtrate inhibited fungal growth by 86.0–87.0% at 20% concentration.

Treatment
A. chroococcum filtratee0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
A. chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
strongeste0
Value
86.0-87.0e0
Qualifier
20% concentration of filtratee0
Comparator
P. fluorescense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“A. chroococcum filtrate also showed the strongest inhibitory effect followed by P. fluorescens with the percentage of inhibition ranging between 86.0-87.0 and 83.0-83.5% for R. solani and F. solani respectively at 20% concentration of filtrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas filtrate inhibited fungal growth by 83.0–83.5% at 20% concentration.

Treatment
P. fluorescense0
Interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
83.0-83.5%e0
Qualifier
20% concentration of filtratee0
Comparator
A. chroococcum filtratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“A. chroococcum filtrate also showed the strongest inhibitory effect followed by P. fluorescens with the percentage of inhibition ranging between 86.0-87.0 and 83.0-83.5% for R. solani and F. solani respectively at 20% concentration of filtrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato seed germination reached 90% with A. chroococcum filtrate.

Treatment
A. chroococcum filtratee0
Interactor
A. chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seeds germinatione0
Direction
reachede0
Value
90%e0
Comparator
P. fluorescens filtratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percentage of seeds germination reached 90% in the treatment of A. chroococcum filtrate and 80% in the treatment of P. fluorescens filtrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato seed germination reached 80% with P. fluorescens filtrate.

Treatment
P. fluorescens filtratee0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seeds germinatione0
Direction
reachede0
Value
80%e0
Comparator
A. chroococcum filtratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percentage of seeds germination reached 90% in the treatment of A. chroococcum filtrate and 80% in the treatment of P. fluorescens filtrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1433 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Azotobacter chroococcum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.