Paper · 2020 · Agriculture

Effect of Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate on the Performance of Tomato

Muhammad Moaaz Ali; Talha Javed; Rosario Paolo Mauro; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
87
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The seed industry and farmers have challenges, which include the production of poor quality and non-certified tomato seed, which ultimately results in decreased crop production. The issue carefully demands pre-sowing treatments using exogenous chemical plant growth-promoting substances. Therefore, to mitigate the above-stated problem, a series of experiments were conducted to improve the quality of tomato seeds (two cultivars, i.e., “Sundar” and “Ahmar”) and to enhance the stand establishment, vigor, physiological, and biochemical attributes under growth chamber and greenhouse conditions by using potassium nitrate (KNO3) as a seed priming agent. Seeds were imbibed in 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 KNO3 (weight/volume) for 24 h and then dried before experiments. The results of growth chamber and greenhouse screening show that experimental units receiving tomato seeds primed with 0.75% KNO3 in both cultivars performed better as compared to other concentrations and nonprimed control. Significant increase in final emergence (%), mean emergence time, and physiological attributes were observed with 0.75% KNO3. Collectively, the improved performance of tomato due to seed priming with 0.75% KNO3 was linked with higher activities of total soluble sugars and phenolics under growth chamber and greenhouse screening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds primed with 0.75% potassium nitrate performed better than other concentrations and unprimed control in both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
primed with 0.75% KNO3e0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other concentrations and nonprimed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato seeds primed with 0.75% KNO3 in both cultivars performed better as compared to other concentrations and nonprimed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.75% potassium nitrate significantly increased final emergence.

Treatment
0.75% KNO3e0
Outcome
final emergence (%)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in final emergence (%), mean emergence time, and physiological attributes were observed with 0.75% KNO3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.75% potassium nitrate significantly increased mean emergence time.

Treatment
0.75% KNO3e0
Outcome
mean emergence timee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in final emergence (%), mean emergence time, and physiological attributes were observed with 0.75% KNO3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.75% potassium nitrate significantly increased physiological attributes.

Treatment
0.75% KNO3e0
Outcome
physiological attributese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in final emergence (%), mean emergence time, and physiological attributes were observed with 0.75% KNO3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors linked improved tomato performance under 0.75% potassium nitrate priming with higher total soluble sugars and phenolics.

Treatment
seed priming with 0.75% KNO3e0
Compound
total soluble sugars and phenolicse0
Outcome
improved performancee0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
growth chamber and greenhouse screeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the improved performance of tomato due to seed priming with 0.75% KNO3 was linked with higher activities of total soluble sugars and phenolics under growth chamber and greenhouse screening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1326 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.