Abstract
Abstract Acid soil can be used for land extensification, but need input technology in order its for maximum crop growth support. The aim of the reserach was to know the effect of Phosphate Solubizing Bacteria and Natural Phosphat Fertilizer on the production of Stringbean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A field trial at Universitas Padjadjaran research station 768 m above sea level had been carried out using randomized block design two factors with factorial pattern and three replications. The first factor was concentration of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (0 ml, 10 ml, 20 ml, 30 ml), while the second factor was the type of natural phosphate fertilizer (120 g of guano polybag −1 , 120 g of rock phosphate polybag −1 and 120 g of swimmer crab flour polybag −1 ). The results showed there was no interaction effect of Phosphate Solubizing Bacteria and Natural Phosphate Fertilizer on harvest index. The type of natural phosphate fertilizer has an independent effect on leaf area and pod dry weight but the value is still below its potential production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Bacteria and natural phosphate fertilizer had no interaction effect on harvest index.
- Taxon
- Stringbean
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Phosphate Solubizing Bacteria and Natural Phosphate Fertilizere0
- Interactor
- Phosphate Solubizing Bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- no interaction effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there was no interaction effect of Phosphate Solubizing Bacteria and Natural Phosphate Fertilizer on harvest index”
t0“stringbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural phosphate fertilizer independently affected stringbean leaf area.
- Taxon
- Stringbean
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- natural phosphate fertilizere0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Qualifier
- below its potential productione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The type of natural phosphate fertilizer has an independent effect on leaf area and pod dry weight but the value is still below its potential production”
t0“stringbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural phosphate fertilizer independently affected pod dry weight, below potential production.
- Taxon
- Stringbean
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- natural phosphate fertilizere0
- Outcome
- pod dry weighte0
- Qualifier
- below its potential productione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The type of natural phosphate fertilizer has an independent effect on leaf area and pod dry weight but the value is still below its potential production”
t0“stringbean”
The same questions in other papers
phosphate · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
phosphorus · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
114 papers more in this group
See all 118 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 331 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
372 papers more in this group
See all 376 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.