Paper · 2020 · Plants

Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Sugar Beet Seedlings to Confer Stress Adaptability under Drought Condition

Md. Jahirul Islam; Ji Woong Kim; Mst. Kohinoor Begum; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study was conducted to examine the adaptability of 11 sugar beet cultivars grown under drought stress in the controlled glasshouse. The treatment was initiated on 30-day-old sugar beet plants where drought stress was made withholding water supply for consecutive 10 days while control was done with providing water as per requirement. It was observed that drought stress expressively reduced plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, and photosynthetic quantum yield in all the cultivars but comparative better results were observed in S1 (MAXIMELLA), S2 (HELENIKA), S6 (RECODDINA), S8 (SV2347), and S11 (BSRI Sugarbeet 2) cultivars. Besides, osmolytes like proline, glycine betaine, total soluble carbohydrate, total soluble sugar, total polyphenol, total flavonoid, and DPPH free radical scavenging activity were remarkably increased under drought condition in MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348, and BSRI Sugar beet 2 cultivars. In contrast, activities of enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) were significantly decreased in all, while the cultivars SV2347, BSRI Sugar beet 1 and BSRI Sugar beet 2 were found with increased ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity under drought condition. In parallel, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) was increased in all cultivars except HELENIKA. Overall, the cultivars HELENIKA, RECODDINA, GREGOIA, SV2347, SV2348, BSRI Sugar beet 1, and BSRI Sugar beet 2 were found best fitted to the given drought condition. These findings would help further for the improvement of stress adaptive sugar beet cultivars development in the breeding program for drought-prone regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress markedly reduced plant growth, photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic quantum yield in all 11 sugar beet cultivars.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, and photosynthetic quantum yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought stress expressively reduced plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, and photosynthetic quantum yield in all the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, comparatively better results were observed in cultivars S1 (MAXIMELLA), S2 (HELENIKA), S6 (RECODDINA), S8 (SV2347) and S11 (BSRI Sugarbeet 2).

Material
S1 (MAXIMELLA), S2 (HELENIKA), S6 (RECODDINA), S8 (SV2347), and S11 (BSRI Sugarbeet 2)e0
Outcome
comparative better resultse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“comparative better results were observed in S1 (MAXIMELLA), S2 (HELENIKA), S6 (RECODDINA), S8 (SV2347), and S11 (BSRI Sugarbeet 2) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline, glycine betaine and total soluble carbohydrate were remarkably increased under drought in MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348 and BSRI Sugar beet 2.

Material
MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348, and BSRI Sugar beet 2e0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
proline, glycine betaine, total soluble carbohydratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“osmolytes like proline, glycine betaine, total soluble carbohydrate, total soluble sugar, total polyphenol, total flavonoid, and DPPH free radical scavenging activity were remarkably increased under drought condition in MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348, and BSRI Sugar beet 2 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble sugar, total polyphenol and total flavonoid were remarkably increased under drought in MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348 and BSRI Sugar beet 2.

Material
MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348, and BSRI Sugar beet 2e0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
total soluble sugar, total polyphenol, total flavonoide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“osmolytes like proline, glycine betaine, total soluble carbohydrate, total soluble sugar, total polyphenol, total flavonoid, and DPPH free radical scavenging activity were remarkably increased under drought condition in MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348, and BSRI Sugar beet 2 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH free radical scavenging activity was remarkably increased under drought in MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348 and BSRI Sugar beet 2.

Material
MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348, and BSRI Sugar beet 2e0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
DPPH free radical scavenging activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“osmolytes like proline, glycine betaine, total soluble carbohydrate, total soluble sugar, total polyphenol, total flavonoid, and DPPH free radical scavenging activity were remarkably increased under drought condition in MAXIMELLA, HELENIKA, TERRANOVA, GREGOIA, SV2348, and BSRI Sugar beet 2 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase were significantly decreased in all cultivars under drought.

Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
activities of enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“activities of enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) were significantly decreased in all, while the cultivars SV2347, BSRI Sugar beet 1 and BSRI Sugar beet 2 were found with increased ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity under drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity increased under drought in cultivars SV2347, BSRI Sugar beet 1 and BSRI Sugar beet 2.

Material
SV2347, BSRI Sugar beet 1 and BSRI Sugar beet 2e0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“activities of enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) were significantly decreased in all, while the cultivars SV2347, BSRI Sugar beet 1 and BSRI Sugar beet 2 were found with increased ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity under drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity increased in all cultivars except HELENIKA.

Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except HELENIKAe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“polyphenol oxidase (PPO) was increased in all cultivars except HELENIKA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1335 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars HELENIKA, RECODDINA, GREGOIA, SV2347, SV2348, BSRI Sugar beet 1 and BSRI Sugar beet 2 were found best fitted to the given drought condition.

Material
HELENIKA, RECODDINA, GREGOIA, SV2347, SV2348, BSRI Sugar beet 1, and BSRI Sugar beet 2e0
Outcome
best fitted to the given drought conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the cultivars HELENIKA, RECODDINA, GREGOIA, SV2347, SV2348, BSRI Sugar beet 1, and BSRI Sugar beet 2 were found best fitted to the given drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1500 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.