Paper · 2020 · Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science)

Effect of reducing rates of NPK, ZA, and KCl fertilizers on the growth and yield of shallot in multiple cropping system in Bantul

Karsidi Karsidi; Endang Sulistyaningsih; Didik Indradewa; et al.

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The intensive application of synthetic/inorganic fertilizer on shallot cultivation tends to contaminate the environment and reduce soil quality. Meanwhile, the decrease of farmland area has been a limiting factor in increasing shallot production. Shallot farmers in Bantul District, D. I. Yogyakarta, commonly combine organic and inorganic fertilizers. Therefore, an alternative technology to sustain the production of shallot is through the application of fertilizer at the right rates and the practice of multiple cropping system. The objective of this research was to determine the growth and yield of shallot as affected by the reduced rates of inorganic fertilizer in multiple cropping systems. This research was conducted from August to November 2016 in Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul District, D. I. Yogyakarta. The research was arranged in a split plot design with three replications. The main plot was cropping system consisting of monoculture system (shallot) and multiple cropping system (shallot – chili). The subplot was fertilizer rates consisting of 100 % as control, 50 %, and 25 %. The results of this research showed that multiple cropping system did not decrease the growth and yield of shallot. Likewise, reducing inorganic fertilizer rates to 50% of control did not decrease shallot yield. However, the inorganic fertilizer rate of 25% significantly decreased shallot yield to 12.15 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple cropping with chili did not decrease the growth and yield of shallot compared with monoculture.

Treatment
multiple cropping systeme1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
did not decreasee1
Comparator
monoculture system (shallot)e4
Setting
Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul Districte5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensive application of synthetic/inorganic fertilizer on shallot cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“multiple cropping system did not decrease the growth and yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1229 · show in text ↑
e4

“monoculture system (shallot) and multiple cropping system (shallot – chili)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1032 · show in text ↑
e5

“This research was conducted from August to November 2016 in Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul District”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing inorganic fertilizer to 50% of the control did not decrease shallot yield.

Treatment
reducing inorganic fertilizer rates to 50% of controle2
Outcome
shallot yielde2
Direction
did not decreasee2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul Districte5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensive application of synthetic/inorganic fertilizer on shallot cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“reducing inorganic fertilizer rates to 50% of control did not decrease shallot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1325 · show in text ↑
e5

“This research was conducted from August to November 2016 in Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul District”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer at 25% of the control significantly decreased shallot yield by 12.15%.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizer rate of 25%e3
Outcome
shallot yielde3
Direction
significantly decreasede3
Value
12.15 %e3
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul Districte5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“reducing inorganic fertilizer rates to 50% of control did not decrease shallot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1325 · show in text ↑
e3

“the inorganic fertilizer rate of 25% significantly decreased shallot yield to 12.15 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1421 · show in text ↑
e5

“This research was conducted from August to November 2016 in Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul District”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–815 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.