Paper · 2020 · Phytopathology

Residue Dynamics of Streptomycin in Citrus Delivered by Foliar Spray and Trunk Injection and Effect on ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ Titer

Jinyun Li; Vladimir G. Kolbasov; Donghwan Lee; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
38
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Liberibacter asiaticus' (CLas) via foliar spray. Here, we studied the residue dynamics of STR and its effect on CLas titers in planta applied by foliar spray and trunk injection of 3-year-old citrus trees that were naturally infected by CLas in the field. After foliar spray, STR levels in leaves peaked at 2 to 7 days postapplication (dpa) and gradually declined thereafter. The STR spray did not significantly affect CLas titers in leaves of treated plants as determined by quantitative PCR. After trunk injection, peak levels of STR were observed 7 to 14 dpa in the leaf and root tissues, and near-peak levels were sustained for another 14 days before significantly declining. At 12 months after injection, moderate to low or undetectable levels of STR were observed in the leaf, root, and fruit, depending on the doses of STR injected, with a residue level of 0.28 µg/g in harvested fruit at the highest injection concentration of 2.0 µg/tree. CLas titers in leaves were significantly reduced by trunk injection of STR at 1.0 or 2.0 g/tree, starting from 7 dpa and throughout the experimental period. The reduction of CLas titers was positively correlated with STR residue levels in leaves. The in planta minimum effective concentration of STR needed to suppress the CLas titer to an undetectable level (cycle threshold ≥36.0) was 1.92 µg/g fresh weight. Determination of the in planta minimum effective concentration of STR against CLas and its spatiotemporal residue levels in planta provides the guidance to use STR for HLB management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray residues in citrus leaves peaked 2 to 7 days after application and then declined.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
foliar spraye0
Outcome
STR levels in leavese0
Direction
peakede0
Value
2 to 7 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After foliar spray, STR levels in leaves peaked at 2 to 7 days postapplication (dpa) and gradually declined thereafter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar streptomycin spray did not significantly change CLas titers in citrus leaves.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Treatment
STR spraye0
Interactor
CLase0pathogen
Outcome
CLas titers in leavese0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The STR spray did not significantly affect CLas titers in leaves of treated plants as determined by quantitative PCR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees that were naturally infected by CLas in the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk-injected streptomycin peaked in citrus leaf and root tissues 7 to 14 days after application, stayed near peak for another 14 days, then declined significantly.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Organ / stage
leaf and root tissuese0
Treatment
trunk injectione0
Outcome
levels of STRe0
Direction
peake0
Value
7 to 14 dpae0
Qualifier
near-peak levels were sustained for another 14 days before significantly declininge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After trunk injection, peak levels of STR were observed 7 to 14 dpa in the leaf and root tissues, and near-peak levels were sustained for another 14 days before significantly declining.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 months after injection, streptomycin residues in citrus leaf, root and fruit ranged from moderate to undetectable depending on dose.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Organ / stage
leaf, root, and fruite0
Treatment
injectione0
Outcome
levels of STRe0
Qualifier
depending on the doses of STR injectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 12 months after injection, moderate to low or undetectable levels of STR were observed in the leaf, root, and fruit, depending on the doses of STR injected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvested citrus fruit had a 0.28 µg/g streptomycin residue at the stated highest injection concentration.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Organ / stage
harvested fruite0
Treatment
injection concentration of 2.0 µg/treee0
Outcome
residue levele0
Value
0.28 µg/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a residue level of 0.28 µg/g in harvested fruit at the highest injection concentration of 2.0 µg/tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk injection of 1.0 or 2.0 g/tree streptomycin significantly reduced CLas titers in citrus leaves from 7 days onward.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Treatment
trunk injection of STR at 1.0 or 2.0 g/treee0
Interactor
CLase0pathogen
Outcome
CLas titers in leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
starting from 7 dpa and throughout the experimental periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CLas titers in leaves were significantly reduced by trunk injection of STR at 1.0 or 2.0 g/tree, starting from 7 dpa and throughout the experimental period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–204 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower CLas titers were associated with higher streptomycin residue levels in citrus leaves.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Interactor
CLase0pathogen
Compound
STRe0
Outcome
reduction of CLas titerse0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of CLas titers was positively correlated with STR residue levels in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1194 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The in-planta minimum effective streptomycin concentration to suppress CLas titer below detection was 1.92 µg/g fresh weight.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Treatment
STRe0
Interactor
CLase0pathogen
Outcome
minimum effective concentration of STR needed to suppress the CLas titer to an undetectable levele0
Value
1.92 µg/g fresh weighte0
Qualifier
cycle threshold ≥36.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The in planta minimum effective concentration of STR needed to suppress the CLas titer to an undetectable level (cycle threshold ≥36.0) was 1.92 µg/g fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“3-year-old citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–204 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · CitrusPositive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.