Paper · 2008 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Biological control of Penicillium italicum, P. digitatum and P. expansum by the predacious yeast Saccharomycopsis schoenii on oranges Controle biológico de Penicillium italicum, P. digitatum e P. expansum com a levedura predadora Saccharomycopsis schoenii em laranjas

Raphael Sânzio Pimenta; Francisco L. Silva; Juliana Freitas de Mello e Silva; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study we evaluated the ability of Saccharomycopsis schoenii Nadson and Krassiln (UWO-PS 80-91) as biocontrol agent against plant pathogenic filamentous fungi P. expansum Link (UFMG 01-2002), P. italicum Wehmer (LCP 61.1199), and P. digitatum (Pers.: Fr.) (LCP 984263, LCP 68175 and LCP 4354). S. schoenii was able to reduce disease severity in oranges inoculated with all fungi. Among the phytopathogens, P. digitatum LCP4354 was the most virulent whereas P. digitatum LCP 68175 was the most susceptible to predation. The yeast was able to survive for 21 days on the fruit surface and did not produce lesions on oranges. Production of antagonistic substances by S. schoenii was not detected using standard techniques. Our results point to the potential use of S. schoenii to control postharvest phytopathogens in fruits. Este estudo avaliou a capacidade de levedura Saccharomycopsis schoenii Nadson & Krassiln (UWO-PS 80-91) em controlar o crescimento dos fungos fitopatogênicos Penicillium expansum Link (UFMG 01-2002), P. italicum Wehmer (LCP 61.1199), e P. digitatum (Pers.: Fr.) (LCP 984263, LCP 68175 e LCP 4354). S. schoenii reduziu a severidade da doença em laranjas inoculadas com todos os fitopatógenos testados. Entre estes fitopatógenos, P. digitatum LCP4354 apresentou a maior virulência enquanto que P. digitatum LCP 68175 foi o mais suscetível à predação. A levedura foi capaz de permanecer viável, sem produzir lesões na superfície dos frutos por 21 dias. Outra característica desejável observada foi a ausência de produção de substâncias antagonistas. Sendo assim, este trabalho evidência o potencial de utilização da levedura S. schoenii em protocolos de controle biológico de doenças pós-colheita em laranjas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeast reduced disease severity on oranges inoculated with P. expansum.

Taxon
orangese0
Treatment
S. schoeniie0
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume1pathogen
Second interactor
S. schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. schoenii was able to reduce disease severity in oranges inoculated with all fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–386 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. expansum Link (UFMG 01-2002)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeast reduced disease severity on oranges inoculated with P. italicum.

Taxon
orangese0
Treatment
S. schoeniie0
Interactor
P. italicumPenicillium italicume1pathogen
Second interactor
S. schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium italicum
Penicillium italicum · InteractorJean.claude · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. schoenii was able to reduce disease severity in oranges inoculated with all fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–386 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. italicum Wehmer (LCP 61.1199), and P. digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeast reduced disease severity on oranges inoculated with P. digitatum.

Taxon
orangese0
Treatment
S. schoeniie0
Interactor
P. digitatumPenicillium digitatume1pathogen
Second interactor
S. schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. schoenii was able to reduce disease severity in oranges inoculated with all fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–386 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. digitatum (Pers.: Fr.) (LCP 984263, LCP 68175 and LCP 4354)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. digitatum LCP4354 was the most virulent pathogen on oranges.

Taxon
orangest0
Interactor
P. digitatum LCP4354Penicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
P. digitatum LCP4354 was the most virulente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the phytopathogens, P. digitatum LCP4354 was the most virulent whereas P. digitatum LCP 68175 was the most susceptible to predation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“on oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. digitatum LCP 68175 was most susceptible to yeast predation.

Taxon
orangest0
Interactor
P. digitatum LCP 68175Penicillium digitatume0pathogen
Second interactor
Saccharomycopsis schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. digitatum LCP 68175 was the most susceptible to predatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. digitatum LCP 68175 was the most susceptible to predation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“on oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saccharomycopsis schoenii Nadson and Krassiln”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeast survived on orange surfaces for 21 days.

Taxon
orangese0
Organ / stage
fruit surfacee0
Interactor
Saccharomycopsis schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
survivee0
Value
21 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“The yeast was able to survive for 21 days on the fruit surface and did not produce lesions on oranges.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–628 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saccharomycopsis schoenii Nadson and Krassiln”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeast caused no lesions on oranges.

Taxon
orangese0
Interactor
Saccharomycopsis schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
did not produce lesions on orangese0

Verbatim

e0

“The yeast was able to survive for 21 days on the fruit surface and did not produce lesions on oranges.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–628 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saccharomycopsis schoenii Nadson and Krassiln”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonistic substances from the yeast were not detected by standard techniques.

Taxon
orangest0
Interactor
S. schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Production of antagonistic substances by S. schoenii was not detectede0

Verbatim

e0

“Production of antagonistic substances by S. schoenii was not detected using standard techniques.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“on oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose S. schoenii for postharvest pathogen control in fruits.

Taxon
orangest0
Interactor
S. schoeniiSaccharomycopsis schoeniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
potential use of S. schoenii to control postharvest phytopathogens in fruitse0

Verbatim

e0

“Our results point to the potential use of S. schoenii to control postharvest phytopathogens in fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“on oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑

Saccharomycopsis schoenii · Penicillium expansum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Saccharomycopsis schoenii · Penicillium italicum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Saccharomycopsis schoenii · Penicillium digitatum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.