Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota during two consecutive kharif seasons (June to January) of each 2017-18 and 2018-19) to find out suitable combination compatibility between insecticides and foliar nutrients for enhancing productivity and profitability of pigeon pea. The experiment was laid out in RBD design comprising eight treatments with three replication and the variety was ICPL 88039. The soil of experimental field was clay loam in texture, alkaline in reaction, medium in organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus and high in potash. On the basis of pooled analysis, the results revealed that application of RDF+multi-micronutrient (Zn 5.0%, Mn 2.0%, Fe 2.0%, Bo 0.5%, Cu 0.5% and Mo 0.05%) spray @ 2 ml l-1 at 50% flowering+Indoxacarb 15.8 EC @ 375 ml ha-1 at flowering+Dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.0 l ha-1 at 15 days after first spray recorded maximum and significantly higher pods plant-1 (179.0), grain yield (1767 kg ha-1), net return (` 70729 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.96) and minimum pod damage by pod borer (5.25%) and pod fly (5.39%). The treatment RDF+multi-micronutrient spray @ 2 ml l-1 at 50% flowering was next in order of efficacy and other parameters being statistically at par with RDF+1% urea+0.25% ZnSO4+0.25% borax spray at 50% flowering. Whereas, the treatment RDF (20 kg N, 50 kg P2O5, 20 kg S, 25 kg Zn ha-1) was found less effective in comparison to other treatments in all the parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The RDF plus multi-micronutrient spray with indoxacarb and dimethoate gave the maximum pods per plant, 179.0.
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane3 - Treatment
- RDF+multi-micronutriente1
- Outcome
- pods plant-1e0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 179.0e0
- Comparator
- RDFe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recorded maximum and significantly higher pods plant-1 (179.0), grain yield (1767 kg ha-1), net return (` 70729 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.96)”
e1“application of RDF+multi-micronutrient”
e2“the treatment RDF (20 kg N, 50 kg P2O5, 20 kg S, 25 kg Zn ha-1) was found less effective in comparison to other treatments in all the parameters”
e3“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the maximum grain yield, 1767 kg per hectare.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane3
- Treatment
- RDF+multi-micronutriente1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1767 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- RDFe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recorded maximum and significantly higher pods plant-1 (179.0), grain yield (1767 kg ha-1), net return (` 70729 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.96)”
e1“application of RDF+multi-micronutrient”
e2“the treatment RDF (20 kg N, 50 kg P2O5, 20 kg S, 25 kg Zn ha-1) was found less effective in comparison to other treatments in all the parameters”
e3“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the maximum net return, 70729 rupees per hectare.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane3
- Treatment
- RDF+multi-micronutriente1
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 70729 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- RDFe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recorded maximum and significantly higher pods plant-1 (179.0), grain yield (1767 kg ha-1), net return (` 70729 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.96)”
e1“application of RDF+multi-micronutrient”
e2“the treatment RDF (20 kg N, 50 kg P2O5, 20 kg S, 25 kg Zn ha-1) was found less effective in comparison to other treatments in all the parameters”
e3“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the maximum B:C ratio, 2.96.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane3
- Treatment
- RDF+multi-micronutriente1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.96e0
- Comparator
- RDFe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recorded maximum and significantly higher pods plant-1 (179.0), grain yield (1767 kg ha-1), net return (` 70729 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.96)”
e1“application of RDF+multi-micronutrient”
e2“the treatment RDF (20 kg N, 50 kg P2O5, 20 kg S, 25 kg Zn ha-1) was found less effective in comparison to other treatments in all the parameters”
e3“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the minimum pod damage by pod borer, 5.25%.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- RDF+multi-micronutriente2
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- pod damage by pod borere0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 5.25%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum pod damage by pod borer (5.25%) and pod fly (5.39%)”
e1“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
e2“application of RDF+multi-micronutrient”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the minimum pod damage by pod fly, 5.39%.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- RDF+multi-micronutriente2
- Interactor
- pod flye0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 5.39%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum pod damage by pod borer (5.25%) and pod fly (5.39%)”
e1“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
e2“application of RDF+multi-micronutrient”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus multi-micronutrient spray at 50% flowering was statistically at par with RDF plus urea and zinc sulphate and borax spray for the other parameters.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- RDF+multi-micronutrient spray @ 2 ml l-1 at 50% floweringe0
- Outcome
- other parameterse0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- RDF+1% urea+0.25% ZnSO4+0.25% borax spray at 50% floweringe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment RDF+multi-micronutrient spray @ 2 ml l-1 at 50% flowering was next in order of efficacy and other parameters being statistically at par with RDF+1% urea+0.25% ZnSO4+0.25% borax spray at 50% flowering”
e1“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF alone was less effective than the other treatments in all parameters.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- RDF (20 kg N, 50 kg P2O5, 20 kg S, 25 kg Zn ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- all the parameterse0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment RDF (20 kg N, 50 kg P2O5, 20 kg S, 25 kg Zn ha-1) was found less effective in comparison to other treatments in all the parameters”
e1“Response of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] to Foliar Application of Nutrient and Pest Management at Flowering Stage”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · pest · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.