Abstract
The agronomic investigation entitled, “Performance of summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.) to fertilizer levels” was undertaken at Post Graduate Research Farm, Agronomy Division of Rajarshee Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj College of Agriculture, Kolhapur (M.S.), India during summer, 2019. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design were replicated thrice with twelve treatment combinations comprises three NP fertilizer levels NP1-75% of RDF, NP2-100% of RDF and NP3-125% of RDF and four potassium levels as a K0- 00 K2O Kg ha-1, K1- 15 K2O Kg ha-1, K2- 20 K2O Kg ha-1 and K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1. Yield and economics of summer green were influenced significantly by different NP fertilizer levels. The grain yield (15.14q ha-1) and stover yield (32.99 q ha-1) of green gram were recorded significantly highest with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) and which was followed by NP2 (100% of RDF) (14.21 q ha-1 grain and 31.55 q ha-1 stover yield respectively), Nutrient content viz., NPK (%) in grain and straw of green gram were found non-significant with different NP fertilizer levels. NPK uptake (kg ha-1) by green were recorded significantly higher with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) and which was found at par with treatment NP2 (100% of RDF) among NP fertilizer levels. Among the potassium levels application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 was recorded significantly maximum grain yield (15.19 q ha-1) and stover yield (33.32 q ha-1) however, it was found at par with K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 (14.67 q ha-1 grain and 32.25q ha-1 stover yield respectively). NPK content (%) in grain and straw of green gram were remain unaffected due to different potassium levels. NPK uptake (kg ha-1) was recorded significantly more with treatment K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 and which was found comparable with treatment K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
NP3 gave the highest grain yield, 15.14q ha-1, followed by NP2 at 14.21 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- green gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Treatment
- NP3 (125% of RDF)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 15.14q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 14.21 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- NP2 (100% of RDF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield (15.14q ha-1) and stover yield (32.99 q ha-1) of green gram were recorded significantly highest with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) and which was followed by NP2 (100% of RDF) (14.21 q ha-1 grain and 31.55 q ha-1 stover yield respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
NP3 gave the highest stover yield, 32.99 q ha-1, followed by NP2 at 31.55 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- NP3 (125% of RDF)e0
- Outcome
- stover yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 32.99 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 31.55 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- NP2 (100% of RDF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield (15.14q ha-1) and stover yield (32.99 q ha-1) of green gram were recorded significantly highest with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) and which was followed by NP2 (100% of RDF) (14.21 q ha-1 grain and 31.55 q ha-1 stover yield respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
NP fertilizer levels did not significantly differ in grain and straw NPK content.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- different NP fertilizer levelse0
- Outcome
- NPK (%) in grain and strawe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nutrient content viz., NPK (%) in grain and straw of green gram were found non-significant with different NP fertilizer levels.”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK uptake was significantly higher under NP3 and at par with NP2.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- NP3 (125% of RDF)e0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- NP2 (100% of RDF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NPK uptake (kg ha-1) by green were recorded significantly higher with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) and which was found at par with treatment NP2 (100% of RDF) among NP fertilizer levels.”
t0“green gram”
Claim · model-written summary
K3 produced maximum grain yield of 15.19 q ha-1 and was at par with K2.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 15.19 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 14.67 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the potassium levels application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 was recorded significantly maximum grain yield (15.19 q ha-1) and stover yield (33.32 q ha-1) however, it was found at par with K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 (14.67 q ha-1 grain and 32.25q ha-1 stover yield respectively).”
t0“green gram”
Claim · model-written summary
K3 produced maximum stover yield of 33.32 q ha-1 and was at par with K2.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- stover yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 33.32 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 32.25q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the potassium levels application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 was recorded significantly maximum grain yield (15.19 q ha-1) and stover yield (33.32 q ha-1) however, it was found at par with K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 (14.67 q ha-1 grain and 32.25q ha-1 stover yield respectively).”
t0“green gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium levels did not affect NPK content in green gram grain and straw.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- different potassium levelse0
- Outcome
- NPK content (%) in grain and strawe0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NPK content (%) in grain and straw of green gram were remain unaffected due to different potassium levels.”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK uptake was significantly greater under the reported K2 treatment.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NPK uptake (kg ha-1) was recorded significantly more with treatment K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 and which was found comparable with treatment K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1.”
t0“green gram”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →potassium · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.