Paper · 2020 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of salinity, growth condition, and soil type on shoot dry matter of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) – a meta-analysis

Sangeeta Bansal; Xinhua Yin

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Salinity is a spatially complex and dynamic property of soil that adversely impacts plant metabolism and rhizobium capacity for symbiotic nitrogen fixation, thus affecting alfalfa (Medicago sativa) growth. The objective of present study was to conduct the first meta-analysis to understand the influence of soil salinity, experimental growth condition, and soil type on alfalfa shoot dry matter. Thus, random-effects model meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) version 3 software across 10 published articles generating 68 observations. The effect sizes were determined as the natural logarithm of the response ratio as a metric response of alfalfa shoot dry matter under saline treatments versus the control treatment. Three moderators used in the study were: 1) Salinity, categorized as (low, 0–5 dS/m; medium, 6–15 dS/m; and high, 16–30 dS/m); 2) experimental conditions (field experiment, greenhouse, growth chamber); and 3) soil type (sand, sandy loam). Alfalfa shoot dry matter decreased significantly under medium and high salinity levels (p≤ 0.05); whereas low salinity did not have significant effect on shoot dry matter (p≥ 0.05). The decrease in shoot dry matter was 40, 43, and 50% under field, greenhouse, and growth chamber, respectively. In terms of soil type, sandy loam soil reduced the alfalfa shoot dry matter by 40%, whereas sandy soil showed a 59% decrease. Low saline soils (i.e., <5 dS/m) and/or sandy loam soil type under field conditions can increase alfalfa shoot dry matter and can outperform high saline soils (i.e., between 6 and 30 dS/m) and/or sandy soil under growth chamber conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and high salinity significantly decreased alfalfa shoot dry matter compared with the control treatment.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
medium and high salinity levelse1
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa shoot dry matter decreased significantly under medium and high salinity levels (p≤ 0.05); whereas low salinity did not have significant effect on shoot dry matter (p≥ 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1169 · show in text ↑
e2

“under saline treatments versus the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low salinity had no significant effect on alfalfa shoot dry matter compared with the control treatment.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
low salinitye1
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
did not have significant effecte1
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa shoot dry matter decreased significantly under medium and high salinity levels (p≤ 0.05); whereas low salinity did not have significant effect on shoot dry matter (p≥ 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1169 · show in text ↑
e2

“under saline treatments versus the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–748 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa shoot dry matter decreased by 40% under field conditions.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
40e1
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The decrease in shoot dry matter was 40, 43, and 50% under field, greenhouse, and growth chamber, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa shoot dry matter decreased by 43% under greenhouse conditions.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
43e1
Setting
greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The decrease in shoot dry matter was 40, 43, and 50% under field, greenhouse, and growth chamber, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa shoot dry matter decreased by 50% in growth chamber experiments.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
50%e1
Setting
growth chambere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The decrease in shoot dry matter was 40, 43, and 50% under field, greenhouse, and growth chamber, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sandy loam soil reduced alfalfa shoot dry matter by 40%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
sandy loam soile1
Outcome
alfalfa shoot dry mattere1
Direction
reducede1
Value
40%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In terms of soil type, sandy loam soil reduced the alfalfa shoot dry matter by 40%, whereas sandy soil showed a 59% decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sandy soil decreased alfalfa shoot dry matter by 59%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
sandy soile1
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
59%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In terms of soil type, sandy loam soil reduced the alfalfa shoot dry matter by 40%, whereas sandy soil showed a 59% decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low saline soils (below 5 dS/m) and/or sandy loam soil under field conditions can increase alfalfa shoot dry matter.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Low saline soils (i.e., <5 dS/m)e1
Outcome
alfalfa shoot dry mattere1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Low saline soils (i.e., <5 dS/m) and/or sandy loam soil type under field conditions can increase alfalfa shoot dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low saline soils can outperform high saline soils (6 to 30 dS/m) and/or sandy soil for alfalfa shoot dry matter under growth chamber conditions.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
low saline soilse2
Outcome
shoot dry mattere2
Direction
outperforme1
Comparator
high saline soilse1
Setting
growth chamber conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“can outperform high saline soils (i.e., between 6 and 30 dS/m) and/or sandy soil under growth chamber conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1647 · show in text ↑
e2

“Low saline soils (i.e., <5 dS/m) and/or sandy loam soil type under field conditions can increase alfalfa shoot dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1530 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

salinity · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 19 positive, 76 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.