Paper · 2020 · VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA

The possibility of using of an aqueous extract from stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) leaves as a biostimulant of plant growth in photoculture

N. G. Sinyavina; A. A. Kochetov; K. V. Egorova; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Relevance. Plant growth biostimulants based on natural raw materials are ecologically safe and harmless to humans. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) contains in its leaves sweet diterpene steviol glycosides, which are similar in structure and properties to gibberellins, as well as a number of other valuable biologically active compounds. Water extracts from stevia leaves are capable to accelerate growth, to increase the yield and quality of plants. However, further study and development of application technologies of the extracts for specific crops and different growing conditions are required. The purpouse of this work is to investigate the effect of an aqueous extract from stevia leaves on the yield and quality of lettuce and small radish under photoculture conditions. Materials and methods. The objects of the study were lettuce var. Typhoon and small radish var. Riesenbutter. The plants were grown in photoculture at the biopolygon of the FSBSI Agrophysical Research Institute (St. Petersburg) at an illumination of 10–20 klx, a temperature of 22–26°С (day) and 18–20°С (night). Watering was carried out with water, top-dressing was carried out with Knop's nutrient solution three times a week. Peat with mineral additives was used as a substrate. The original extract was prepared by extraction from stevia dry leaves powder with hot water (80°С) in a ratio of 1 g of leaves: 100 ml of water. Foliar treatment of plants was carried out twice at dilution of the original extract from stevia leaves 1:10, 1:50, and 1:100 (extract : water) at the rate of 0.20-0.25 ml / lettuce plant and 0.09-0.1 ml / radish plant; control plants were treated with water. The data were processed according to standard procedures using the Excel 2016 software. Results. Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leaves did not significantly affect the size and weight of radish root crops, but increased the yield due to a decrease in the number of bolting plants. A significant decrease of bolting was observed in all treatment options (by 34-51%). When using a dilution of 1: 100, the yield of marketable root crops increased by 20% and the yield per sq. m. – by 25%. Foliar treatment with stevia extracts increased the mass of lettuce plants, as well as their biological value. The content of photosynthetic pigments, sugars, and vitamin C significantly increased, and a tendency towards a decrease in the content of nitrates was observed. According to data, we recommend for foliar treatment are dilutions of the original extract 1:50 and 1: 100. The effect of using of an extract from stevia leaves is similar in action to some biostimulants from plants with hormone-like properties, which determines the possibility of using it as a safe plant growth stimulant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar stevia leaf extract did not significantly affect the size and weight of radish root crops.

Treatment
Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leavese1
Outcome
size and weight of radish root cropse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leaves did not significantly affect the size and weight of radish root crops, but increased the yield due to a decrease in the number of bolting plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar stevia leaf extract increased radish yield through fewer bolting plants.

Treatment
Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leavese1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
due to a decrease in the number of bolting plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leaves did not significantly affect the size and weight of radish root crops, but increased the yield due to a decrease in the number of bolting plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar stevia leaf extract significantly decreased bolting of radish by 34-51% in all treatment options.

Treatment
treatment optionse1
Outcome
boltinge1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
34-51%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A significant decrease of bolting was observed in all treatment options (by 34-51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2049 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leaves did not significantly affect the size and weight of radish root crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dilution 1:100 of the stevia leaf extract increased marketable radish root crop yield by 20%.

Treatment
dilution of 1: 100e1
Outcome
yield of marketable root cropse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When using a dilution of 1: 100, the yield of marketable root crops increased by 20% and the yield per sq. m. – by 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2169 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leaves did not significantly affect the size and weight of radish root crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dilution 1:100 of the stevia leaf extract increased radish yield per square metre by 25%.

Treatment
dilution of 1: 100e1
Outcome
yield per sq. m.e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When using a dilution of 1: 100, the yield of marketable root crops increased by 20% and the yield per sq. m. – by 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2169 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar treatment with an extract from stevia leaves did not significantly affect the size and weight of radish root crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar stevia leaf extract increased the mass of lettuce plants and their biological value.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Foliar treatment with stevia extractse1
Outcome
mass of lettuce plantse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
as well as their biological valuee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar treatment with stevia extracts increased the mass of lettuce plants, as well as their biological value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar stevia leaf extract significantly increased photosynthetic pigment, sugar and vitamin C content of lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
Foliar treatment with stevia extractse2
Outcome
content of photosynthetic pigments, sugars, and vitamin Ce1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The content of photosynthetic pigments, sugars, and vitamin C significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2282–2367 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar treatment with stevia extracts increased the mass of lettuce plants, as well as their biological value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar stevia leaf extract tended to decrease nitrate content of lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
Foliar treatment with stevia extractse2
Outcome
content of nitratese1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
a tendency towardse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“and a tendency towards a decrease in the content of nitrates was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2369–2442 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar treatment with stevia extracts increased the mass of lettuce plants, as well as their biological value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2280 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar application of the stevia leaf extract at 1:50 and 1:100 dilutions.

Taxon
lettuce and small radishe1
Treatment
foliar treatmente2
Outcome
dilutions of the original extract 1:50 and 1: 100e2

Verbatim

e1

“on the yield and quality of lettuce and small radish under photoculture conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“we recommend for foliar treatment are dilutions of the original extract 1:50 and 1: 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2463–2550 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the stevia leaf extract can be used as a safe plant growth stimulant.

Taxon
lettuce and small radishe1
Outcome
safe plant growth stimulante2

Verbatim

e1

“on the yield and quality of lettuce and small radish under photoculture conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“which determines the possibility of using it as a safe plant growth stimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2690–2767 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Foliar boron decreased yields in radish.

    The Contribution of Foliar Exposure to Boron Toxicity · 2007 · compared with without a component of foliar contact

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

botanical · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 53 positive, 99 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

botanical · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.