Paper · 2020 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil

Seo Young Oh; Kyung Hwan Moon; Minji Shin; et al.

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The photosynthesis, productivity, and mineral content of Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris subsp. napus var. pekinensis cv. Detong) grown in different soil types on Jeju Island were investigated to develop soil–crop system management, with the goal of increasing crop productivity and quality. The soils were black volcanic ash soil (BS), very dark-brown volcanic ash soil (VDBS), and dark- brown non-volcanic ash soil (DBS). VDBS had a pH of 5.87, relatively close to the optimal pH range for Chinese cabbage cultivation, and slightly higher than the pH of BS and DBS; it had high contents of organic matter, available P2O5, and exchangeable cations (K, Ca, Mg, etc.). Growth of the cabbage head including height, diameter, fresh weight, leaf numbers, and leaf area were greater in Chinese cabbage grown in VDBS compared to BS or DBS. Root biomass was also greater in VDBS, although root length did not differ significantly among soil types. However, the soluble solid content was lower in VDBS than in BS or DBS. The maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of photosystem II was slightly higher in VDBS and DBS, although it had stable values ≥ 0.8 in all three soil types. The SPAD values did not differ significantly and were ≥ 55 in all three soil types. The water-use efficiency (WUE) was slightly higher in VDBS, although the maximum photosynthetic rate (A) and dark respiration (Rd) did not differ among soil types. Of the mineral elements in cabbage head, total nitrogen was lower in VDBS than in BS and DBS. However, all macronutrients, except Mg, and micronutrient Cu were slightly higher in VDBS than in the other soil types. These results suggest that the relatively favorable soil conditions of VDBS (suboptimal pH, high mineral content, etc.) and high water-use efficiency of Chinese cabbage favor head growth and its nutritional value. VDBS was suitable for cultivating Chinese cabbage, considering productivity and product quality, such as its size, weight, and mineral content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VDBS soil had pH 5.87 and high organic matter, available P2O5 and exchangeable cations.

Outcome
pHe0
Value
5.87e0
Setting
VDBSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VDBS had a pH of 5.87, relatively close to the optimal pH range for Chinese cabbage cultivation, and slightly higher than the pH of BS and DBS; it had high contents of organic matter, available P2O5, and exchangeable cations (K, Ca, Mg, etc.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese cabbage head height, diameter and fresh weight were greater in VDBS than in BS or DBS.

Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
height, diameter, fresh weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
BS or DBSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of the cabbage head including height, diameter, fresh weight, leaf numbers, and leaf area were greater in Chinese cabbage grown in VDBS compared to BS or DBS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese cabbage head leaf numbers and leaf area were greater in VDBS than BS or DBS.

Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
leaf numbers, and leaf areae0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
BS or DBSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of the cabbage head including height, diameter, fresh weight, leaf numbers, and leaf area were greater in Chinese cabbage grown in VDBS compared to BS or DBS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese cabbage root biomass was greater in VDBS.

Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
Root biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
soil typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root biomass was also greater in VDBS, although root length did not differ significantly among soil types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese cabbage root length did not differ significantly among soil types.

Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
soil typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root biomass was also greater in VDBS, although root length did not differ significantly among soil types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese cabbage soluble solid content was lower in VDBS than BS or DBS.

Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
soluble solid contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
BS or DBSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soluble solid content was lower in VDBS than in BS or DBS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosystem II Fv/Fm was slightly higher in VDBS and DBS, with values at least 0.8 in all soils.

Treatment
VDBS and DBSe0
Outcome
maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of photosystem IIe0
Direction
slightly highere0
Value
≥ 0.8e0
Comparator
all three soil typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of photosystem II was slightly higher in VDBS and DBS, although it had stable values ≥ 0.8 in all three soil types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD values did not differ significantly among soils and were at least 55.

Treatment
soil typese0
Outcome
SPAD valuese0
Direction
did not differe0
Value
≥ 55e0
Comparator
all three soil typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SPAD values did not differ significantly and were ≥ 55 in all three soil types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was slightly higher in VDBS.

Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
water-use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
slightly highere0
Comparator
soil typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water-use efficiency (WUE) was slightly higher in VDBS, although the maximum photosynthetic rate (A) and dark respiration (Rd) did not differ among soil types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum photosynthetic rate and dark respiration did not differ among soil types.

Treatment
soil typese0
Outcome
maximum photosynthetic rate (A) and dark respiration (Rd)e0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
soil typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water-use efficiency (WUE) was slightly higher in VDBS, although the maximum photosynthetic rate (A) and dark respiration (Rd) did not differ among soil types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage head total nitrogen was lower in VDBS than BS and DBS.

Organ / stage
cabbage heade0
Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
BS and DBSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the mineral elements in cabbage head, total nitrogen was lower in VDBS than in BS and DBS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage head macronutrients other than Mg and micronutrient Cu were slightly higher in VDBS.

Treatment
VDBSe0
Outcome
all macronutrients, except Mg, and micronutrient Cue0
Direction
slightly highere0
Comparator
the other soil typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all macronutrients, except Mg, and micronutrient Cu were slightly higher in VDBS than in the other soil types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and the Mineral Content of Chinese Cabbage Grown on Very Dark-Brown Volcanic Ash Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered VDBS suitable for Chinese cabbage cultivation based on productivity and product quality.

Outcome
suitable for cultivating Chinese cabbagee0
Setting
VDBSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VDBS was suitable for cultivating Chinese cabbage, considering productivity and product quality, such as its size, weight, and mineral content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1998 · show in text ↑

light · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

light · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.