Abstract
Pigeonpeais one of the major crops and grown in an area of 67,547 ha in drought prone Ananthapuramu district. However due usage of the long duration traditional Pigeonpea varieties and continuous failure of the NE monsoon coincides with the crop critical stages (Flower bud initiation, flowering, pod development in the district are the major drawbacks for the declined productivity. An attempt was done at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuramu on different options available for the irrigation to the pigeonpea crop during kharif,2016. Experimental results revealed that growth parameters like plant height and stem girth were higher with continuous irrigations whereas higher yield and yield attributing parameters were registered with flooding (irrigation at all five critical stages irrigations). Flood irrigation at 5 critical stages registered the highest additional net income of Rs 1,10,300 ha-1 which was closely followed by Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development stages with an additional net income of Rs 94,100, However higher BC ratio (7.63) was obtained with Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development stages. Drip irrigation at Flowering and Pod development registered higher water use efficiency (3.68 kg ha-1mm-1) on mean basis.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous irrigation gave higher plant height and stem girth.
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- continuous irrigationse0
- Outcome
- plant height and stem girthe0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height and stem girth were higher with continuous irrigations”
t0“Irrigation management in Pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding at five critical stages gave higher yield and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- flooding (irrigation at all five critical stages irrigations)e0
- Outcome
- yield and yield attributing parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher yield and yield attributing parameters were registered with flooding (irrigation at all five critical stages irrigations)”
t0“Irrigation management in Pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols”
Claim · model-written summary
Flood irrigation at five critical stages yielded the highest additional net income of Rs 1,10,300 ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Flood irrigation at 5 critical stagese0
- Outcome
- additional net incomee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rs 1,10,300 ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flood irrigation at 5 critical stages registered the highest additional net income of Rs 1,10,300 ha-1”
t0“Irrigation management in Pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development yielded additional net income of Rs 94,100.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development stagese0
- Outcome
- additional net incomee0
- Value
- Rs 94,100e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development stages with an additional net income of Rs 94,100”
t0“Irrigation management in Pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development yielded the higher BC ratio of 7.63.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development stagese0
- Outcome
- BC ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.63e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher BC ratio (7.63) was obtained with Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development stages”
t0“Irrigation management in Pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at flowering and pod development yielded higher mean water use efficiency of 3.68 kg ha-1mm-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Drip irrigation at Flowering and Pod developmente0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.68 kg ha-1mm-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Drip irrigation at Flowering and Pod development registered higher water use efficiency (3.68 kg ha-1mm-1) on mean basis”
t0“Irrigation management in Pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols”
The same questions in other papers
flooding · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
irrigation · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
50 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.