Paper · 2020 · Acta agriculturae Serbica

In vitro propagation and medium-term conservation of autochthonous plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'

Tatjana Vujović; Darko Jevremović; Tatjana Marjanović; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

In vitro strategies for the propagation and conservation of indigenous species contribute to the sustainable use of plant diversity and are essential for breeding programs as well. In this study, we established an efficient protocol for the micropropagation of autochthonous plum 'Crvena Ranka' and examined the survival and regrowth capacity of in vitro shoots after 3, 6 and 9 months of cold storage (CS) at +5 oC in total darkness. Aseptic culture was established on the Murashige and Skoog medium containing 2 mg l-1 BA, 0.5 mg l-1 IBA and 0.1 mg l-1 GA3 (leaf rosette initiation being 68.8%). During in vitro propagation on the medium of constant hormonal composition, a significant increase in the multiplication index was observed in the third subculture, whereupon it was mainly stable until the fifth subculture. The effect of BA concentration and/or type of auxins (IBA or NAA) on multiplication parameters, as well as on fresh and dry weights of shoots was evaluated. BA at 1 mg l-1 in combination with NAA significantly increased shoot multiplication parameters. The effect of auxins on rooting parameters was monitored as well. Shoots cultured on the medium supplemented with NAA also displayed higher rooting ability (60%), in comparison with those grown on the medium containing IBA at the same concentration (20%). In vitro shoots can be conserved over the medium term under CS conditions up to six months. High survival was achieved after three (94%) and six months (82.5%), while severe signs of necrosis (100%) were noticed after nine months of conservation. Shoots subcultured under standard growth conditions after CS promptly regained their morphology although their capacity for multiplication and rooting was slightly lower than that of non-cold-stored shoots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The establishment medium yielded 68.8% leaf rosette initiation.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Treatment
2 mg l-1 BA, 0.5 mg l-1 IBA and 0.1 mg l-1 GA3e0
Outcome
leaf rosette initiatione0
Value
68.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aseptic culture was established on the Murashige and Skoog medium containing 2 mg l-1 BA, 0.5 mg l-1 IBA and 0.1 mg l-1 GA3 (leaf rosette initiation being 68.8%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiplication index increased significantly in the third subculture and then was mainly stable to the fifth.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Organ / stage
third subculturee0
Outcome
multiplication indexe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in the multiplication index was observed in the third subculture, whereupon it was mainly stable until the fifth subculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BA with NAA significantly increased shoot multiplication parameters.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Treatment
BA at 1 mg l-1 in combination with NAAe0
Outcome
shoot multiplication parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BA at 1 mg l-1 in combination with NAA significantly increased shoot multiplication parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA medium gave 60% rooting, higher than IBA medium at 20%.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
rooting abilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
60%e0
Qualifier
20%e0
Comparator
IBAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots cultured on the medium supplemented with NAA also displayed higher rooting ability (60%), in comparison with those grown on the medium containing IBA at the same concentration (20%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot survival after three months of cold storage was 94%.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Outcome
survivale0
Value
94%e0
Qualifier
threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High survival was achieved after three (94%) and six months (82.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot survival after six months of cold storage was 82.5%.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Outcome
survivale0
Value
82.5%e0
Qualifier
six monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High survival was achieved after three (94%) and six months (82.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All shoots showed necrosis after nine months of cold storage.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Outcome
severe signs of necrosise0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
nine monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe signs of necrosis (100%) were noticed after nine months of conservation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold-stored shoots regained their morphology after standard-condition subculture.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Organ / stage
Shootse0
Outcome
regained their morphologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots subcultured under standard growth conditions after CS promptly regained their morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1673 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold-stored shoots had slightly lower multiplication and rooting capacity than non-stored shoots.

Material
'Crvena Ranka't0
Treatment
CSe1
Outcome
capacity for multiplication and rootinge0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
non-cold-stored shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their capacity for multiplication and rooting was slightly lower than that of non-cold-stored shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1784 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cultivar 'Crvena Ranka'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoots subcultured under standard growth conditions after CS promptly regained their morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1673 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · pest · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cold · pest · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.