Paper · 2020 · Flower Research Journal

Assessment of Preservative Solutions for Reducing Botrytis cinerea Infection in Cut Roses

Suong Tuyet Thi Ha; Yong-Tae Kim; Byung-Chun In

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Botrytis cinerea is a necrotrophic pathogen that significantly reduced the postharvest quality and longevity of cut roses. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of nano silver, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and salicylic acid on B. cinerea infection in cut rose flowers. Cut ‘Revival’ roses were treated with nano silver, NaOCl, salicylic acid, and distilled water, and simultaneously held in the solutions. Subsequently, the cut flowers were sprayed with B. cinerea solution and held under export conditions for 4 days. The results showed that nano silver was the most effective treatment in suppressing B. cinerea growth in cut roses during vase life. Nano silver effectively extended the vase life of cut roses by 2.3 days, compared with non-treated flowers. The addition of nano silver also enhanced water uptake and sustained the water balance and fresh weight of the cut rose flowers. Our results indicated that nano silver is an effective treatment solution to inhibit B. cinerea infection and improve postharvest quality and longevity of cut rose flowers for export.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver was the most effective treatment in suppressing Botrytis cinerea growth in cut roses during vase life.

Taxon
cut rosese2
Treatment
nano silvere2
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae2pathogen
Outcome
B. cinerea growthe2
Direction
suppressinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“nano silver was the most effective treatment in suppressing B. cinerea growth in cut roses during vase life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver extended the vase life of cut roses by 2.3 days compared with non-treated flowers.

Taxon
cut rosese3
Treatment
Nano silvere3
Outcome
vase lifee3
Direction
extendede3
Value
2.3 dayse3
Comparator
non-treated flowerse3

Verbatim

e3

“Nano silver effectively extended the vase life of cut roses by 2.3 days, compared with non-treated flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver enhanced water uptake in cut rose flowers.

Taxon
cut rose flowerse4
Treatment
addition of nano silvere4
Outcome
water uptakee4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The addition of nano silver also enhanced water uptake and sustained the water balance and fresh weight of the cut rose flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver sustained the water balance and fresh weight of cut rose flowers.

Taxon
cut rose flowerse4
Treatment
addition of nano silvere4
Outcome
water balance and fresh weighte4
Direction
sustainede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The addition of nano silver also enhanced water uptake and sustained the water balance and fresh weight of the cut rose flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–899 · show in text ↑

silver atom · Botrytis cinerea · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silver atom · quality: postharvest · RosaResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · Botrytis cinerea · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · RosaResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.