Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Remote Sensing

Identification and quantification of potassium (K+) deficiency in maize plants using an unmanned aerial vehicle and visible / near-infrared semi-professional digital camera

Renato Herrig Furlanetto; Marco Rafael Nanni; Luís Guilherme Teixeira Crusiol; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Brazil is one of the largest producers of maize worldwide. However, this production is threatened due to low soil fertility, especially low levels of potassium (K+). K+ is one of the most important nutrients in plant metabolism, acting on enzymatic activation and also on photosynthetic processes. The identification of its deficiency by using traditional methods is difficult with regard to timely restoration of the nutrient to adequate levels. Therefore, the use of low-cost modified cameras attached to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are important tools for agricultural monitoring. Nevertheless, there are no reports of studies with the purpose of evaluating the monitoring of K+ deficiency in maize crops using multispectral images captured from UAVs. Therefore, this study aimed at exploring the possibility of identifying K+ deficiency and quantifying the nutrient leaf content by using a Vegetation Index (VI). The experiment was carried out at the National Soybean Research Centre (Embrapa Soja, a branch of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation). The experimental plots were constantly managed in order to obtain different conditions of K+ availability to plants, achieving levels that ranged from severe deficiency to an adequate nutrient level. The following treatments were established: severe potassium deficiency (SPD), moderate potassium deficiency (MPD) and adequate supply of potassium (ASP). The evaluations were performed in the Brazilian maize crop referred to as ‘safrinha, at the V7, V12 and R3 developmental stages, with image capture covering the visible and near-infrared region, using two Fujifilm IS PRO digital cameras attached to an UAV. In these development stages, leaves were collected to determine tissue K+ concentration. The images were radiometrically corrected with the support of calibration targets and reference values, using an Fieldspec 3 Jr. spectroradiometer. The VIs comprised the ratio among the red, green and infrared spectral bands, that is, green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), ratio between infrared and green (GRVI), ratio between green and infrared (GNIR), ratio between red and infrared (RNIR) and ratio between infrared and red (RVI). Regarding all the treatments assessed, the results showed that foliar K+ was statistically different. The VIs were efficient only in differentiating SPD and ASP treatments at all development stages evaluated. However, none were statistically significant for MPD. The linear regressions showed a high coefficient of determination (R2) and low root mean square error (RMSE) value; the best prediction of K+ concentration obtained was at V12 for regressions with these VIs: GRVI (R2 = 0.79, RMSE 4.50 g kg−1) and RVI (R2 = 0.71, RMSE 4.39 g kg−1). The grain yield values showed that SPD caused an average reduction of 5,645.90 kg ha−1 in relation to the ASP. Considering MPD, the grain yield was 1,242.00 kg ha−1 lower in comparison with ASP. In conclusion, estimating foliar K+ content and identifying its deficiency in maize crops based on the VIs of multispectral images from cameras attached to UAVs is possible, which ensures agility to these evaluations in a non-destructive manner, improving efficiency of K+ fertilization and providing farmers with a new tool.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium differed statistically across the three supply treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
foliar K+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding all the treatments assessed, the results showed that foliar K+ was statistically different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2267–2368 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation indices distinguished severe deficiency from adequate potassium supply at all assessed stages.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
differentiating SPD and ASP treatmentse0
Comparator
ASPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The VIs were efficient only in differentiating SPD and ASP treatments at all development stages evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2369–2475 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation indices did not distinguish moderate deficiency significantly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
statistically significant for MPDe0
Comparator
MPDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, none were statistically significant for MPD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2476–2529 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At V12, GRVI predicted leaf potassium concentration with R2 0.79 and RMSE 4.50 g kg−1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
K+ concentratione0
Value
R2 = 0.79, RMSE 4.50 g kg−1e0
Qualifier
GRVIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best prediction of K+ concentration obtained was at V12 for regressions with these VIs: GRVI (R2 = 0.79, RMSE 4.50 g kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2646–2772 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At V12, RVI predicted leaf potassium concentration with R2 0.71 and RMSE 4.39 g kg−1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
K+ concentratione0
Value
R2 = 0.71, RMSE 4.39 g kg−1e0
Qualifier
RVIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best prediction of K+ concentration obtained was at V12 for regressions with these VIs: GRVI (R2 = 0.79, RMSE 4.50 g kg−1) and RVI (R2 = 0.71, RMSE 4.39 g kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2646–2810 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe potassium deficiency reduced grain yield by 5,645.90 kg ha−1 relative to adequate supply.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SPDe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5,645.90 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
ASPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield values showed that SPD caused an average reduction of 5,645.90 kg ha−1 in relation to the ASP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2812–2921 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate potassium deficiency yielded 1,242.00 kg ha−1 less grain than adequate supply.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
MPDe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1,242.00 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
ASPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considering MPD, the grain yield was 1,242.00 kg ha−1 lower in comparison with ASP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2923–3006 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that UAV multispectral vegetation indices can estimate maize leaf potassium and identify deficiency without destructive sampling.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
estimating foliar K+ content and identifying its deficiencye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“estimating foliar K+ content and identifying its deficiency in maize crops based on the VIs of multispectral images from cameras attached to UAVs is possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3022–3179 · show in text ↑

spermidine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect

290 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

316 papers more in this group

See all 320 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.