Abstract
The objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of food waste compost application on Chinese cabbage growth and soil chemical properties. For field experiment, seven different treatments (livestock compost (LC), livestock compost + chemical fertilizer (NPK), food waste compost (FWC), food waste compost + chemical fertilizer, food waste compost + livestock compost (FWC+LC), food waste compost + livestock compost + chemical fertilizer, and control) were applied to Chinese cabbage grown field. All the treatment were carried out in 3 replicates with completely randomized design. Treatment of FWC+LC+NPK showed highest values in all parameters (leaf length, leaf width, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry weight) of Chinese cabbage. Especially fresh and dry weight of Chinese cabbage treated with FWC+LC+NPK showed two times higher values compared to control. The electrical conductivity, organic matter, and cation exchange capacity in soils treated with both FWC and LC showed significant increase compared to control, while pH, and available P2O5 content did not.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
FWC+LC+NPK gave the highest Chinese cabbage leaf dimensions, chlorophyll content, and fresh and dry weight.
- Taxon
- Chinese cabbage
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensise0 - Treatment
- FWC+LC+NPKe0
- Outcome
- leaf length, leaf width, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment of FWC+LC+NPK showed highest values in all parameters (leaf length, leaf width, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry weight) of Chinese cabbage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fresh and dry weight with FWC+LC+NPK were twice those of controls.
- Taxon
- Chinese cabbageBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise0
- Treatment
- FWC+LC+NPKe0
- Outcome
- fresh and dry weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- two timese0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Especially fresh and dry weight of Chinese cabbage treated with FWC+LC+NPK showed two times higher values compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soils receiving both FWC and LC had significantly increased electrical conductivity, organic matter, and cation exchange capacity relative to control.
- Treatment
- both FWC and LCe0
- Outcome
- electrical conductivity, organic matter, and cation exchange capacitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The electrical conductivity, organic matter, and cation exchange capacity in soils treated with both FWC and LC showed significant increase compared to control, while pH, and available P2O5 content did not.”
t0“Chinese Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH and available P2O5 did not increase significantly with both FWC and LC.
- Treatment
- both FWC and LCe0
- Outcome
- pH, and available P2O5 contente0
- Direction
- did note0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The electrical conductivity, organic matter, and cation exchange capacity in soils treated with both FWC and LC showed significant increase compared to control, while pH, and available P2O5 content did not.”
The same questions in other papers
grazing · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
fertilization · soil: chemistry · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.