Paper · 2021 · European Journal of Agronomy

Nitrogen fertilization strategies for improved Mediterranean rainfed wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency

Daniel Plaza-Bonilla; Jorge Lampurlanés; Fabián G. Fernández; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Adequate fertilization strategies are paramount to fulfill increasing demands for food, feed and fiber while reducing environmental impacts. However, their optimization under Mediterranean no-till systems has received little attention. The objective of this work was to assess winter cereal yield and water and N use efficiencies in a rainfed semiarid Mediterranean climate under (i) a range of pre-plant fertilizers [control without N fertilizer (0 N), and the following at 75 kg N ha−1: mineral N (MIN), swine slurry (SS), poultry manure (PM), and compost (COM)], (ii) fertilizer incorporation: no-tillage without incorporating (NT) or incorporation with a vibrocultivator (INC) and (iii) application of urea-ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) as top-dress as a control without UAN (UAN-) or 50 kg N ha−1 (UAN+). The experiment covered six cropping seasons (2012–2019). Pre-plant applications had similar responses in crop yield, biomass, N uptake, grain N, water-use efficiency for biomass (WUEb), and water-use efficiency for yield (WUEy) but were greater than 0 N. The lack of differences between pre-plant fertilizers would be explained by the high amount of residual N and the mineralized N during the crop cycle. Top-dress UAN increased WUEy and crop yield in all the cropping seasons by an average of 587 kg grain ha−1, which represented 18 % of the total annual production. Averaged across variables and the growing seasons, INC reduced soil water content and WUEb by 10 % (from 24.3 to 21.8 kg ha−1 mm−1). Also, INC reduced grain yield by 9% (from 3799 to 3450 kg ha−1) by reducing the number of spikes m-2 produced, pointing out that INC resulted in water deficit during the early reproductive period of the crop. While INC is often consider a best management practice to reduce NH3 volatilization losses from broadcast fertilizer applications, the results demonstrate that in rainfed Mediterranean agroecosystems water is more limiting than the N that could be potentially lost by volatilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-plant fertilizers gave similar responses across crop yield, biomass, nitrogen uptake, grain nitrogen and water-use efficiency.

Treatment
Pre-plant applicationse0
Outcome
crop yield, biomass, N uptakee0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-plant applications had similar responses in crop yield, biomass, N uptake, grain N, water-use efficiency for biomass (WUEb), and water-use efficiency for yield (WUEy)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-plant fertilizers outperformed no nitrogen for the listed crop responses.

Treatment
Pre-plant applicationse0
Outcome
crop yield, biomass, N uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
0 Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-plant applications had similar responses in crop yield, biomass, N uptake, grain N, water-use efficiency for biomass (WUEb), and water-use efficiency for yield (WUEy) but were greater than 0 N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top-dress UAN increased yield by an average of 587 kg grain ha−1 across seasons.

Treatment
Top-dress UANe0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
587 kg grain ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Top-dress UAN increased WUEy and crop yield in all the cropping seasons by an average of 587 kg grain ha−1, which represented 18 % of the total annual production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top-dress UAN increased water-use efficiency for yield across seasons.

Treatment
Top-dress UANe0
Outcome
WUEye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Top-dress UAN increased WUEy and crop yield in all the cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation reduced soil water content.

Treatment
INCe0
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“INC reduced soil water content and WUEb by 10 % (from 24.3 to 21.8 kg ha−1 mm−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation reduced biomass water-use efficiency by 10%.

Treatment
INCe0
Outcome
WUEbe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10 %e0
Qualifier
from 24.3 to 21.8 kg ha−1 mm−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“INC reduced soil water content and WUEb by 10 % (from 24.3 to 21.8 kg ha−1 mm−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation reduced grain yield by 9%.

Treatment
INCe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9%e0
Qualifier
from 3799 to 3450 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“INC reduced grain yield by 9% (from 3799 to 3450 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation reduced the number of spikes per area.

Outcome
number of spikes m-2e0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by reducing the number of spikes m-2 produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley performance and water and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–135 · show in text ↑

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.