Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The effect of ameliorant on peat soil properties and shallots productivity in peatlands

Maswar; A Firmansyah; U Haryati; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Shallot farming on peatland has physical, chemical and biological constraints which does not support crop growth properly. These constraints can usually be treated with amelioration. It is therefore important to understand the effects of applying ameliorant on soil properties and shallots productivity. The study was conducted in Central Kalimantan Province of Indonesia from April to August 2017. In this study, ameliorant such as 10 t ha −1 mineral soil + 4 t ha −1 dolomite + 5 t ha −1 manure has been applied into 0 – 20 cm soil depth. Furthermore, NPK fertilizer, peat fertilizer, bio fertilizer, mulch and or a combination thereof had been added as the treatments. The results showed that application of mineral soil + dolomite + manure was able to improve the physical, and chemical properties of soil on all treatments such as increases in bulk density, mineral content, pH, Ca, Mg, K, base saturation, and P, so that the improved soil condition can support the shallots growth properly. The shallot dry weight production ranged from 9.60 to 15.49 t ha −1 . As a comparison, Indonesia’s national average shallots productions is 9.31 t ha −1 . This finding indicates that shallots farming can be considered as the alternative for peatlands utilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral soil, dolomite and manure increased peat-soil bulk density, mineral content and pH.

Treatment
mineral soil + dolomite + manuree0
Outcome
bulk density, mineral content, pHe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mineral soil + dolomite + manure was able to improve the physical, and chemical properties of soil on all treatments such as increases in bulk density, mineral content, pH, Ca, Mg, K, base saturation, and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral soil, dolomite and manure increased peat-soil Ca, Mg and K.

Treatment
mineral soil + dolomite + manuree0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, Ke0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mineral soil + dolomite + manure was able to improve the physical, and chemical properties of soil on all treatments such as increases in bulk density, mineral content, pH, Ca, Mg, K, base saturation, and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral soil, dolomite and manure increased peat-soil base saturation and P.

Treatment
mineral soil + dolomite + manuree0
Outcome
base saturation, and Pe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mineral soil + dolomite + manure was able to improve the physical, and chemical properties of soil on all treatments such as increases in bulk density, mineral content, pH, Ca, Mg, K, base saturation, and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallot dry-weight production ranged from 9.60 to 15.49 t ha −1.

Outcome
dry weight productione0
Value
9.60 to 15.49 t ha −1e0
Setting
Central Kalimantan Province of Indonesiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shallot dry weight production ranged from 9.60 to 15.49 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“Central Kalimantan Province of Indonesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–380 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose shallot farming as an alternative use of peatland.

Outcome
alternative for peatlands utilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots farming can be considered as the alternative for peatlands utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1268 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 81 positive, 9 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.