Paper · 2020 · Italus Hortus

Effect of biodegradable nonwoven covers on yield and chemical composition of overwintering onion

Andrzej Kalisz; Agnieszka Sękara; Andrzej Jurkow; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Floating row covers are important pre-harvest factors for maximizing the yield of vegetable crops grown under open-field conditions. It is necessary to replace oil-based nonwoven covers with biodegradable ones that are environmentally friendly. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of biodegradable nonwoven covers, made of aliphatic-aromatic copolyesters, with or without fatty acid dimers (SB20/13, SB21/13, and SB28/13), on yield and chemical composition of ‘Glacier’ and ‘Swift’ winter onions. In the first experiment, we observed a higher total marketable yield and higher harvest index for onions covered with SB21/13 (by 24% and 3%, respectively) when compared to the control (polypropylene nonwoven). The SB20/13 cover significantly decreased mean bulb weight by 15.3% than in control. Bulbs harvested from the plots covered with SB21/13 had lower dry weight by 3.2-3.7% and those covered with SB28/13 showed the lowest L-ascorbic acid content when compared to all other treatments (by 6.3-10.3%). The lowest total sugar content was found in control onion bulbs, but it was significantly different only from bulbs covered by SB20/13, which had more sugar by 10.6%. In the second experiment, plants covered with the SB28/13 had a 1 st grade yield of onions higher by 47% than that of the control. The highest mean bulb weight was obtained from plants covered with the SB21/13 nonwoven. Covering with nonwovens caused a decrease in dry weight (SB20/13 and SB21/13, by 1.3-1.7%, respectively) and L-ascorbic acid (all nonwovens, by 15.6% for SB21/13 up to 22% for SB20/13) in onion bulbs in comparison to the control. Since the tested biodegradable nonwovens covers did not cause any decrease in the yield of winter onions compared to polypropylene nonwovens, the former appear to be a suitable environmental-friendly solution for the open-field cultivation of this important vegetable crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB21/13 increased marketable onion yield by 24% in experiment one.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB21/13e0
Outcome
total marketable yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
control (polypropylene nonwoven)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first experiment, we observed a higher total marketable yield and higher harvest index for onions covered with SB21/13 (by 24% and 3%, respectively) when compared to the control (polypropylene nonwoven).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB21/13 increased onion harvest index by 3% in experiment one.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB21/13e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3%e0
Comparator
control (polypropylene nonwoven)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first experiment, we observed a higher total marketable yield and higher harvest index for onions covered with SB21/13 (by 24% and 3%, respectively) when compared to the control (polypropylene nonwoven).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SB20/13 decreased mean onion bulb weight by 15.3% relative to control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB20/13 covere0
Outcome
mean bulb weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SB20/13 cover significantly decreased mean bulb weight by 15.3% than in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB21/13 produced onion bulbs with 3.2-3.7% lower dry weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB21/13e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
3.2-3.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulbs harvested from the plots covered with SB21/13 had lower dry weight by 3.2-3.7% and those covered with SB28/13 showed the lowest L-ascorbic acid content when compared to all other treatments (by 6.3-10.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB28/13 produced the lowest bulb L-ascorbic acid content, 6.3-10.3% below other treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB28/13e0
Outcome
L-ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6.3-10.3%e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulbs harvested from the plots covered with SB21/13 had lower dry weight by 3.2-3.7% and those covered with SB28/13 showed the lowest L-ascorbic acid content when compared to all other treatments (by 6.3-10.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SB20/13 onion bulbs contained 10.6% more sugar than controls.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB20/13e0
Outcome
total sugar contente0
Direction
moree0
Value
10.6%e0
Comparator
control onion bulbse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest total sugar content was found in control onion bulbs, but it was significantly different only from bulbs covered by SB20/13, which had more sugar by 10.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB28/13 raised first-grade onion yield by 47% in experiment two.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB28/13e0
Outcome
1 st grade yield of onionse0
Direction
highere0
Value
47%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second experiment, plants covered with the SB28/13 had a 1 st grade yield of onions higher by 47% than that of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB21/13 had the highest mean bulb weight in experiment two.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB21/13 nonwovene0
Outcome
mean bulb weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean bulb weight was obtained from plants covered with the SB21/13 nonwoven.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB20/13 reduced onion bulb dry weight in experiment two.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB20/13e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
1.3-1.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Covering with nonwovens caused a decrease in dry weight (SB20/13 and SB21/13, by 1.3-1.7%, respectively) and L-ascorbic acid (all nonwovens, by 15.6% for SB21/13 up to 22% for SB20/13) in onion bulbs in comparison to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB21/13 reduced onion bulb dry weight in experiment two.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB21/13e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
1.3-1.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Covering with nonwovens caused a decrease in dry weight (SB20/13 and SB21/13, by 1.3-1.7%, respectively) and L-ascorbic acid (all nonwovens, by 15.6% for SB21/13 up to 22% for SB20/13) in onion bulbs in comparison to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB21/13 reduced bulb L-ascorbic acid by 15.6%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB21/13e0
Outcome
L-ascorbic acide0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
15.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Covering with nonwovens caused a decrease in dry weight (SB20/13 and SB21/13, by 1.3-1.7%, respectively) and L-ascorbic acid (all nonwovens, by 15.6% for SB21/13 up to 22% for SB20/13) in onion bulbs in comparison to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB20/13 reduced bulb L-ascorbic acid by 22%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SB20/13e0
Outcome
L-ascorbic acide0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Covering with nonwovens caused a decrease in dry weight (SB20/13 and SB21/13, by 1.3-1.7%, respectively) and L-ascorbic acid (all nonwovens, by 15.6% for SB21/13 up to 22% for SB20/13) in onion bulbs in comparison to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“overwintering onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider biodegradable nonwoven covers suitable for open-field winter onion cultivation because yield was not reduced relative to polypropylene.

Taxon
winter onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
biodegradable nonwovens coverse0
Outcome
suitable environmental-friendly solutione0
Comparator
polypropylene nonwovense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Since the tested biodegradable nonwovens covers did not cause any decrease in the yield of winter onions compared to polypropylene nonwovens, the former appear to be a suitable environmental-friendly solution for the open-field cultivation of this important vegetable crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1912 · show in text ↑