Paper · 2021 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Impact of different mulching material and weed management practices on weed dynamics, growth, fruit yield and economics of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

T Arun Kumar; K. Radha Rani; S. Sridevi

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to assess the impact of different mulching practices on growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) at College of Horticulture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana during 2015. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with seven treatments in three replications. Growth and fruit yield (28.37 tha-1) were highest under black polythene mulch followed by reflective polythene mulch. Similarly, weed density, weed dry weight and weed control efficiency were significantly lowest with black polythene mulch at 20 and 40 Days after transplanting (DAT) while paddy husk recorded significantly lowest weed control efficiency. Highest Benefit Cost ratio (2.10) was recorded in black polythene mulch whereas lowest (1.04) was recorded in unweeded plot.These results indicated that black polythene mulch and reflective polythene mulch were effective for better growth and yield in tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch gave the highest tomato growth, followed by reflective polythene mulch.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
reflective polythene mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and fruit yield (28.37 tha-1) were highest under black polythene mulch followed by reflective polythene mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch gave the highest fruit yield of 28.37 tha-1, followed by reflective polythene mulch.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
28.37 tha-1e0
Comparator
reflective polythene mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and fruit yield (28.37 tha-1) were highest under black polythene mulch followed by reflective polythene mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch had the lowest weed density at 20 and 40 days after transplanting.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
20 and 40 Days after transplanting (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed density, weed dry weight and weed control efficiency were significantly lowest with black polythene mulch at 20 and 40 Days after transplanting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch had the lowest weed dry weight at 20 and 40 days after transplanting.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
20 and 40 Days after transplanting (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed density, weed dry weight and weed control efficiency were significantly lowest with black polythene mulch at 20 and 40 Days after transplanting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch had the lowest reported weed control efficiency at 20 and 40 days after transplanting.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
20 and 40 Days after transplanting (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control efficiency were significantly lowest with black polythene mulch at 20 and 40 Days after transplanting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy husk had the lowest weed control efficiency.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
paddy huske0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“paddy husk recorded significantly lowest weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch had the highest benefit cost ratio, 2.10.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Outcome
Benefit Cost ratioe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
2.10e0
Comparator
unweeded plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest Benefit Cost ratio (2.10) was recorded in black polythene mulch whereas lowest (1.04) was recorded in unweeded plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unweeded plot had the lowest benefit cost ratio, 1.04.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.04e0
Setting
unweeded plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest (1.04) was recorded in unweeded plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–152 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that black polythene mulch is effective for better tomato growth and yield.

Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Outcome
better growth and yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“black polythene mulch and reflective polythene mulch were effective for better growth and yield in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–930 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that reflective polythene mulch is effective for better tomato growth and yield.

Treatment
reflective polythene mulche0
Outcome
better growth and yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“black polythene mulch and reflective polythene mulch were effective for better growth and yield in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–930 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

poly(ethylene) · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

poly(ethylene) · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mulching · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

mulching · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 49 positive, 6 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.