Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of planting systems and mulching on soil hydrothermal regime, plant physiology, yield and water use efficiency in tomato

Anant Bahadur; Arshdeep Singh; Keshav Singh

18
claims
38
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A two year study was conducted to determine the response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials. Results indicated that planting systems significantly influenced the soil moisture regimes; weed growth and water use efficiency but did not affect the yield and other parameters. Mulch materials significantly influenced the hydrothermal regime of soil, physiological traits, yield and water use efficiency. Black polythene and paddy straw mulch have significantly higher soil water tensions (−56.6 to -38.4 kPa) and moisture in soil profile (15.1–18.4%). The maximum leaf area (0.426 m2/plant), specific leaf area (8.47 mg/cm2), fruit yield (400.08 q/ha) and water use efficiency (96.58 kg/ha-mm) were obtained under paddy straw mulch. The lowest dry weed biomass (5.5 g/m2) was recorded under black polythene. Black polythene, transparent polythene and paddy straw mulch saved 17, 11.3 and 15.4% water than unmulched control. Furrow irrigated raised bed saved about 36% water over flat bed planting. As for as the interaction of planting system and mulch is concerned, the maximum dry matter production (231.03 g/plant), fruit yield (449.36 q/ha) and water use efficiency (143.57 kg/ha-mm) was noticed under raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulching. This combination also saved about 49% water with 55% higher yield over absolute control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting systems significantly influenced soil moisture regimes, weed growth and water use efficiency in tomato.

Treatment
planting systemse1
Outcome
soil moisture regimese1
Qualifier
weed growth and water use efficiencye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting systems significantly influenced the soil moisture regimes; weed growth and water use efficiency but did not affect the yield and other parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting systems did not affect tomato yield and other parameters.

Treatment
planting systemse1
Outcome
yield and other parameterse1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting systems significantly influenced the soil moisture regimes; weed growth and water use efficiency but did not affect the yield and other parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene and paddy straw mulch gave significantly higher soil water tensions (−56.6 to -38.4 kPa) in tomato.

Treatment
Black polythene and paddy straw mulche3
Outcome
soil water tensionse3
Direction
highere3
Value
−56.6 to -38.4 kPae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e3

“Black polythene and paddy straw mulch have significantly higher soil water tensions (−56.6 to -38.4 kPa) and moisture in soil profile (15.1–18.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene and paddy straw mulch gave significantly higher moisture in the soil profile (15.1–18.4%) in tomato.

Treatment
Black polythene and paddy straw mulche3
Outcome
moisture in soil profilee3
Direction
highere3
Value
15.1–18.4%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e3

“Black polythene and paddy straw mulch have significantly higher soil water tensions (−56.6 to -38.4 kPa) and moisture in soil profile (15.1–18.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw mulch gave the maximum leaf area (0.426 m2/plant) in tomato.

Treatment
paddy straw mulche4
Outcome
leaf areae4
Direction
maximume4
Value
0.426 m2/plante4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum leaf area (0.426 m2/plant), specific leaf area (8.47 mg/cm2), fruit yield (400.08 q/ha) and water use efficiency (96.58 kg/ha-mm) were obtained under paddy straw mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw mulch gave the maximum specific leaf area (8.47 mg/cm2) in tomato.

Treatment
paddy straw mulche4
Outcome
specific leaf areae4
Direction
maximume4
Value
8.47 mg/cm2e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum leaf area (0.426 m2/plant), specific leaf area (8.47 mg/cm2), fruit yield (400.08 q/ha) and water use efficiency (96.58 kg/ha-mm) were obtained under paddy straw mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw mulch gave the maximum fruit yield (400.08 q/ha) in tomato.

Treatment
paddy straw mulche4
Outcome
fruit yielde4
Direction
maximume4
Value
400.08 q/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum leaf area (0.426 m2/plant), specific leaf area (8.47 mg/cm2), fruit yield (400.08 q/ha) and water use efficiency (96.58 kg/ha-mm) were obtained under paddy straw mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw mulch gave the maximum water use efficiency (96.58 kg/ha-mm) in tomato.

Treatment
paddy straw mulche4
Outcome
water use efficiencye4
Direction
maximume4
Value
96.58 kg/ha-mme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum leaf area (0.426 m2/plant), specific leaf area (8.47 mg/cm2), fruit yield (400.08 q/ha) and water use efficiency (96.58 kg/ha-mm) were obtained under paddy straw mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene gave the lowest dry weed biomass (5.5 g/m2) in tomato plots.

Treatment
black polythenee5
Outcome
dry weed biomasse5
Direction
loweste5
Value
5.5 g/m2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lowest dry weed biomass (5.5 g/m2) was recorded under black polythene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene saved 17% water compared with the unmulched control in tomato.

Treatment
Black polythenee6
Outcome
watere6
Direction
savede6
Value
17e6
Comparator
unmulched controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e6

“Black polythene, transparent polythene and paddy straw mulch saved 17, 11.3 and 15.4% water than unmulched control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent polythene saved 11.3% water compared with the unmulched control in tomato.

Treatment
transparent polythenee6
Outcome
watere6
Direction
savede6
Value
11.3e6
Comparator
unmulched controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e6

“Black polythene, transparent polythene and paddy straw mulch saved 17, 11.3 and 15.4% water than unmulched control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw mulch saved 15.4% water compared with the unmulched control in tomato.

Treatment
paddy straw mulche6
Outcome
watere6
Direction
savede6
Value
15.4%e6
Comparator
unmulched controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e6

“Black polythene, transparent polythene and paddy straw mulch saved 17, 11.3 and 15.4% water than unmulched control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow irrigated raised bed saved 36% water compared with flat bed planting in tomato.

Treatment
Furrow irrigated raised bede7
Outcome
watere7
Direction
savede7
Value
36%e7
Comparator
flat bed plantinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e7

“Furrow irrigated raised bed saved about 36% water over flat bed planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting with paddy straw mulching gave the maximum dry matter production (231.03 g/plant) in tomato.

Treatment
raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulchinge7
Outcome
dry matter productione7
Direction
maximume7
Value
231.03 g/plante7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e7

“the maximum dry matter production (231.03 g/plant), fruit yield (449.36 q/ha) and water use efficiency (143.57 kg/ha-mm) was noticed under raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting with paddy straw mulching gave the maximum fruit yield (449.36 q/ha) in tomato.

Treatment
raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulchinge7
Outcome
fruit yielde7
Direction
maximume7
Value
449.36 q/hae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e7

“the maximum dry matter production (231.03 g/plant), fruit yield (449.36 q/ha) and water use efficiency (143.57 kg/ha-mm) was noticed under raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting with paddy straw mulching gave the maximum water use efficiency (143.57 kg/ha-mm) in tomato.

Treatment
raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulchinge7
Outcome
water use efficiencye7
Direction
maximume7
Value
143.57 kg/ha-mme7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e7

“the maximum dry matter production (231.03 g/plant), fruit yield (449.36 q/ha) and water use efficiency (143.57 kg/ha-mm) was noticed under raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting with paddy straw mulching saved 49% water compared with the absolute control in tomato.

Treatment
raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulchinge7
Outcome
watere6
Direction
savede6
Value
49%e6
Comparator
absolute controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e7

“the maximum dry matter production (231.03 g/plant), fruit yield (449.36 q/ha) and water use efficiency (143.57 kg/ha-mm) was noticed under raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1290 · show in text ↑
e6

“This combination also saved about 49% water with 55% higher yield over absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting with paddy straw mulching gave 55% higher yield than the absolute control in tomato.

Treatment
raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulchinge7
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
55%e6
Comparator
absolute controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of a tomato crop to three planting systems and three mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–125 · show in text ↑
e7

“the maximum dry matter production (231.03 g/plant), fruit yield (449.36 q/ha) and water use efficiency (143.57 kg/ha-mm) was noticed under raised bed planting coupled with paddy straw mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1290 · show in text ↑
e6

“This combination also saved about 49% water with 55% higher yield over absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1379 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

organic · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

59 papers: 53 positive, 6 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

organic · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

tillage · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 40 positive, 16 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

organic · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.