Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sewage sludge vermicomposts significantly inhibited growth of tomato plants

A claim from Comparison of Suppressiveness of Vermicomposts Produced from Animal Manures and Sewage Sludge against Phytophthora nicotianae Breda de Haan var. nicotianae · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge vermicomposts significantly inhibited growth of tomato plants

Treatment
vermicomposts from sewage sludgee3
Outcome
growth of the plantse4
Direction
inhibitede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325
e3

“The vermicomposts from sewage sludge did not protect tomato seedlings against P. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–818
e4

“They also significantly inhibited growth of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–875

Title

Comparison of Suppressiveness of Vermicomposts Produced from Animal Manures and Sewage Sludge against Phytophthora nicotianae Breda de Haan var. nicotianae

M. Szczech; U. Smolińska Journal of Phytopathology 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0434.2001.00586.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e56cc367e22bed22aad5d66c5e497e27202c9455ed24d585e678aec9eb26f839 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

organic · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this claim · 567 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

659 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.