Paper · 2001 · Journal of Phytopathology

Comparison of Suppressiveness of Vermicomposts Produced from Animal Manures and Sewage Sludge against Phytophthora nicotianae Breda de Haan var. nicotianae

M. Szczech; U. Smolińska

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
69
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The degrees of suppression produced by vermicomposts produced from cattle manure, sheep manure or horse manure and by vermicomposts produced from sewage sludge were compared in greenhouse experiments. The effect of these vermicomposts on the growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae was studied. The density of the pathogen and the number of micro‐organisms in container media amended with vermicomposts were also analysed. The vermicomposts produced from animal manure significantly reduced the infection of tomato seedlings by the pathogen. The density of P. nicotianae in media which included these vermicomposts was similar to that in infested peat substrate (control treatment). The vermicomposts from sewage sludge did not protect tomato seedlings against P. nicotianae . They also significantly inhibited growth of the plants as well as decreasing the density of the pathogen in container media. In general the vermicomposts had no effect on total number of micro‐organisms in potting media compared with control. They only had higher levels of actinomycetes but this did not appear to correspond with their ability to suppress the pathogen.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicomposts produced from animal manure significantly reduced infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae

Treatment
vermicomposts produced from animal manuree1
Interactor
Phytophthora nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
infection of tomato seedlingse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“The vermicomposts produced from animal manure significantly reduced the infection of tomato seedlings by the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Density of Phytophthora nicotianae in media with animal-manure vermicomposts was similar to infested peat

Treatment
vermicompostse2
Interactor
P. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee2pathogen
Outcome
density of P. nicotianae in mediae2
Direction
similare2
Comparator
infested peat substratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“The density of P. nicotianae in media which included these vermicomposts was similar to that in infested peat substrate (control treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicomposts from sewage sludge did not protect tomato seedlings against Phytophthora nicotianae

Treatment
vermicomposts from sewage sludgee3
Interactor
P. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee3pathogen
Outcome
protect tomato seedlingse3
Direction
did not protecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325 · show in text ↑
e3

“The vermicomposts from sewage sludge did not protect tomato seedlings against P. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge vermicomposts significantly inhibited growth of tomato plants

Treatment
vermicomposts from sewage sludgee3
Outcome
growth of the plantse4
Direction
inhibitede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325 · show in text ↑
e3

“The vermicomposts from sewage sludge did not protect tomato seedlings against P. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–818 · show in text ↑
e4

“They also significantly inhibited growth of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge vermicomposts decreased the density of the pathogen in container media

Treatment
vermicomposts from sewage sludgee3
Interactor
Phytophthora nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
density of the pathogen in container mediae5
Direction
decreasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325 · show in text ↑
e3

“The vermicomposts from sewage sludge did not protect tomato seedlings against P. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–818 · show in text ↑
e5

“decreasing the density of the pathogen in container media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicomposts had no effect on total number of micro-organisms in potting media compared with control

Treatment
vermicompostse6
Outcome
total numbere6
Direction
no effecte6
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325 · show in text ↑
e6

“the vermicomposts had no effect on total number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1004 · show in text ↑
e7

“compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1062 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicomposts had higher levels of actinomycetes that did not correspond with their ability to suppress the pathogen

Outcome
levels of actinomycetese1
Qualifier
did not appear to correspond with their ability to suppress the pathogene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and infection of tomato seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae var. nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“They only had higher levels of actinomycetes but this did not appear to correspond with their ability to suppress the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1190 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Phytophthora nicotianae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

organic · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 567 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.