Abstract
Drought is the most common abiotic stress limiting chickpea production because chickpea is usually grown under the residual soil moisture. To identify and evaluate drought tolerant chickpea genotypes, the study was carried out during rabi season 2018 and 2019 with three biological replications at Agricultural biotechnology experiment field, SVPUAT, Meerut India. The experiment materials consisted of 10 chickpea genotypes. Chickpea genotypes were significantly different for evaluated traits under non stress and stress conditions, indicating that drought stress increased variation for these traits. Drought stress reduced seed yield and its attributes. Mean seed yield was decreased by 20.46 % and 19.31% in Vishal during 2018 and 2019, respectively under non stress condition than irrigated condition. ICC 14778, JG 11 and ICC 4958 genotypes were detected with high seed yield under non irrigated and irrigated condition. They were also observed superior to the seed yield under irrigated condition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress reduced seed yield and its attributes in chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Drought stresse0
- Outcome
- seed yield and its attributese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non stresse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes”
e0“Drought stress reduced seed yield and its attributes”
e4“Chickpea genotypes were significantly different for evaluated traits under non stress and stress conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean seed yield of Vishal decreased by 20.46% and 19.31% in 2018 and 2019 under the non stress condition, relative to the irrigated condition as worded in the abstract.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Material
- Vishale1
- Treatment
- non stress conditione1
- Outcome
- Mean seed yielde1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 20.46 % and 19.31%e1
- Qualifier
- during 2018 and 2019, respectivelye1
- Comparator
- irrigated conditione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes”
e1“Mean seed yield was decreased by 20.46 % and 19.31% in Vishal during 2018 and 2019, respectively under non stress condition than irrigated condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes ICC 14778, JG 11 and ICC 4958 had high seed yield under non irrigated and irrigated conditions.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Material
- ICC 14778, JG 11 and ICC 4958e2
- Outcome
- high seed yielde2
- Qualifier
- under non irrigated and irrigated conditione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes”
e2“ICC 14778, JG 11 and ICC 4958 genotypes were detected with high seed yield under non irrigated and irrigated condition”
Claim · model-written summary
ICC 14778, JG 11 and ICC 4958 were also superior in seed yield under irrigated condition.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Material
- ICC 14778, JG 11 and ICC 4958e2
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Qualifier
- under irrigated conditione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes”
e2“ICC 14778, JG 11 and ICC 4958 genotypes were detected with high seed yield under non irrigated and irrigated condition”
e3“They were also observed superior to the seed yield under irrigated condition”
The same questions in other papers
drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.