Abstract
Performance of 28 chickpea cultivars was evaluated for yield, flowering, stress tolerance and vegetative and fruiting characteristics in a plastic green house study under need-based watering and water stress conditions during April, 1994. Grain yield of all the cultivars reduced significantly except cultivar ICC 10448 and Bheema with and grains (g/pot), respectively. Degree of yield reduction varied with cultivars and it was less with ICC 10448, Bheema, Hyprosola and, more with ICCN 12464, ICCL 83228 and Nabin, Significantly, the highest correlation (r=0.902) of yield was observed with pod number (r2=0.810) followed by harvest index (r=0.745, r2= 0.547). Water stress delayed flower initiation, reduced root-shoot dry weight and yield components in all the cultlvars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced grain yield in most chickpea cultivars, except ICC 10448 and Bheema.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- water stresse1
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- except cultivar ICC 10448 and Bheemae0
- Comparator
- need-based wateringe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield of all the cultivars reduced significantly except cultivar ICC 10448 and Bheema”
e1“under need-based watering and water stress conditions”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield reduction was smaller for ICC 10448, Bheema and Hyprosola.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ICC 10448, Bheema, Hyprosolae0
- Outcome
- yield reductione0
- Direction
- lesse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Degree of yield reduction varied with cultivars and it was less with ICC 10448, Bheema, Hyprosola”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield reduction was greater for ICCN 12464, ICCL 83228 and Nabin.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ICCN 12464, ICCL 83228 and Nabine0
- Outcome
- yield reductione1
- Direction
- moree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“more with ICCN 12464, ICCL 83228 and Nabin”
e1“Degree of yield reduction varied with cultivars”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea yield correlated with pod number at r=0.902.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- pod numbere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- r=0.902e0
- Qualifier
- r2=0.810e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest correlation (r=0.902) of yield was observed with pod number (r2=0.810)”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea yield correlated with harvest index at r=0.745.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- r=0.745e0
- Qualifier
- r2= 0.547e0
- Comparator
- harvest indexe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“harvest index (r=0.745, r2= 0.547)”
e1“correlation (r=0.902) of yield was observed with pod number (r2=0.810) followed by harvest index”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress delayed chickpea flower initiation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- flower initiatione0
- Direction
- delayede0
- Comparator
- need-based wateringe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress delayed flower initiation, reduced root-shoot dry weight and yield components in all the cultlvars.”
e1“under need-based watering and water stress conditions”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced chickpea root-shoot dry weight in all cultivars.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- root-shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- need-based wateringe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress delayed flower initiation, reduced root-shoot dry weight and yield components in all the cultlvars.”
e1“under need-based watering and water stress conditions”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced chickpea yield components in all cultivars.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- yield componentse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- need-based wateringe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress delayed flower initiation, reduced root-shoot dry weight and yield components in all the cultlvars.”
e1“under need-based watering and water stress conditions”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)”
The same questions in other papers
drought · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →drought · phenology · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.