Paper · 2021 · Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

Effect of Foliar Copper-Containing Superabsorbent Polymers on Nutritional Characteristics and Mycotoxin Contamination of Wheat Kernel

Ivana Kolackova; Hana Abigail Gruberova; Ondrej Kratochvil; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Novel use of superabsorbent polymers to deliver copper-based foliar fertilization was tested as a means against fungal mycotoxin production and monitor its effect on nutritional characteristics of wheat. Experiment was located in Žabčice, South Moravia region of the Czech Republic, tested wheat variety was 'Julie'. Differences in fertilization medium (water or superabsorbent polymers) and copper treatments (control, CuO, CuSO4, Cu-EDTA, CuO-nano) were tested. Effect of different variants on percentage of ash, crude protein, crude fat and crude fiber, acid detergent fiber, ash-free neutral detergent fiber, lignin, cellulose and starch were determined. Moreover, concentration of deoxynivalenol and T-2 toxin depending on the variant was measured. The highest amounts of crude fat and crude fiber were observed in variant of Cu-nano with superabsorbent polymers, the lowest in CuO respectively. Higher amount of cellulose was found in SAP control, lowest in water control. There were no significant differences in other nutritional parameters. Of the evaluated mycotoxins, we did not detect the deoxynivalenol in any of our samples. For the second evaluated mycotoxin, there was also no difference observed in T-2 toxin production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu-nano with superabsorbent polymers gave the highest crude fat and crude fiber in wheat kernel.

Treatment
Cu-nano with superabsorbent polymerse1
Outcome
crude fat and crude fibere1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest amounts of crude fat and crude fiber were observed in variant of Cu-nano with superabsorbent polymers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO gave the lowest crude fat and crude fiber in wheat kernel.

Treatment
CuOe2
Outcome
crude fat and crude fibere1
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest amounts of crude fat and crude fiber were observed in variant of Cu-nano with superabsorbent polymers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lowest in CuO respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cellulose was higher in the SAP control than in other wheat kernel variants.

Treatment
SAP controle3
Outcome
cellulosee3
Direction
Highere3
Comparator
water controle3

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202 · show in text ↑
e3

“Higher amount of cellulose was found in SAP control, lowest in water control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cellulose was lowest in the water control wheat kernel.

Treatment
water controle3
Outcome
cellulosee3
Direction
loweste3

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202 · show in text ↑
e3

“Higher amount of cellulose was found in SAP control, lowest in water control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–977 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences occurred in other nutritional parameters of wheat kernel between variants.

Outcome
other nutritional parameterse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202 · show in text ↑
e4

“There were no significant differences in other nutritional parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1048 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deoxynivalenol was not detected in any wheat kernel sample.

Outcome
deoxynivalenole5
Qualifier
in any of our samplese5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202 · show in text ↑
e5

“we did not detect the deoxynivalenol in any of our samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No difference was observed in T-2 toxin production between wheat kernel variants.

Outcome
T-2 toxin productione6
Direction
no differencee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202 · show in text ↑
e6

“there was also no difference observed in T-2 toxin production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1236 · show in text ↑