Paper · 2021 · Open Journal of Soil Science

Mineral Fertilizer Use for Optimal Groundnut Production in the Sudano-Guinean and Sudanian Zones of Benin

Faki O. Chabi; Gustave D. Dagbenonbakin; Emile C. Agbangba; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aims to determine the optimal N, P, K, Mg and Zn rates for groundnut production on Ferric and Plintic Luvisol in the Sudano-Guinean and Sudanian zones of Benin Republic. Two years (2018 and 2019) experiment was carried out in the municipality of Ouessè in the Sudano-Guinean zone and Bembèrèkè in the Sudanian zone. The tested nutrient doses were N (0, 20 and 40 kg⋅ha−1), P (0, 25 and 50 kg⋅ha−1), K (0, 20 and 40 kg⋅ha−1), Mg (0, 15 and 30 kg⋅ha−1) and Zn (0, 4 and 8 kg⋅ha−1). The Box and Behnken rotating design is used to define the N, P, K, Mg and Zn rate combinations leading to 46 combinations. A completely randomized bloc design was setting up considering farmers as replication. In total, four farmers’ fields were selected. A one-way analysis of variance is carried out on yield data, using the linear mixed-effect model. Response surface analyses were used to determine the optimal doses for each N, P, K, Mg and Zn. Nodule production (6.5 times higher than the control), number of gynophores (2.8 times higher than the control) and root length (19.2 ± 0.2 cm) of groundnut plants were significantly (p = 0.0001) improved with nutrient application. The response surface analysis shows that treatments N-P-K-Mg-Zn of 16.01-20.18-6.70-5.65-2.47 (in the Sudano-Guinean zone) and 13.1-25.07-11.47-0-1.82 (in the Sudanian zone) are the optimal rates that have induced optimal yield of 2.1 t⋅ha−1 (i.e. 2.5 times the yield in the farmers’ field) pod yield and the best return on investment per hectare. Nevertheless, for a sustainable groundnut producproduction, treatment 13.1-25.07-11.47-20-1.82 is suggested as regular K input is required for the respect of the fertilization laws.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application raised groundnut nodule production 6.5 times over the control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
nutrient applicatione0
Outcome
Nodule productione0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.5 timese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nodule production (6.5 times higher than the control), number of gynophores (2.8 times higher than the control) and root length (19.2 ± 0.2 cm) of groundnut plants were significantly (p = 0.0001) improved with nutrient application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application raised groundnut gynophore number 2.8 times over the control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
nutrient applicatione0
Outcome
number of gynophorese0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.8 timese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nodule production (6.5 times higher than the control), number of gynophores (2.8 times higher than the control) and root length (19.2 ± 0.2 cm) of groundnut plants were significantly (p = 0.0001) improved with nutrient application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application significantly improved groundnut root length, reported as 19.2 ± 0.2 cm.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
nutrient applicatione0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
19.2 ± 0.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nodule production (6.5 times higher than the control), number of gynophores (2.8 times higher than the control) and root length (19.2 ± 0.2 cm) of groundnut plants were significantly (p = 0.0001) improved with nutrient application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1171 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal N-P-K-Mg-Zn rates in the Sudano-Guinean zone were 16.01-20.18-6.70-5.65-2.47.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
optimal ratese0
Value
16.01-20.18-6.70-5.65-2.47e0
Setting
Sudano-Guinean zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatments N-P-K-Mg-Zn of 16.01-20.18-6.70-5.65-2.47 (in the Sudano-Guinean zone) and 13.1-25.07-11.47-0-1.82 (in the Sudanian zone) are the optimal rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1368 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal N-P-K-Mg-Zn rates in the Sudanian zone were 13.1-25.07-11.47-0-1.82.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
optimal ratese0
Value
13.1-25.07-11.47-0-1.82e0
Setting
Sudanian zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatments N-P-K-Mg-Zn of 16.01-20.18-6.70-5.65-2.47 (in the Sudano-Guinean zone) and 13.1-25.07-11.47-0-1.82 (in the Sudanian zone) are the optimal rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal nutrient rates produced groundnut pod yield of 2.1 t⋅ha−1, 2.5 times yield in farmers’ fields.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
optimal yielde0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
optimale0
Value
2.1 t⋅ha−1e0
Comparator
farmers’ fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimal yield of 2.1 t⋅ha−1 (i.e. 2.5 times the yield in the farmers’ field) pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1473 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal nutrient rates also gave the best return on investment per hectare.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
return on investment per hectaree0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“the best return on investment per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1519 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For sustainable groundnut production, the authors suggest treatment 13.1-25.07-11.47-20-1.82 to maintain regular potassium input.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
treatment 13.1-25.07-11.47-20-1.82e0
Qualifier
regular K inpute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“for a sustainable groundnut producproduction, treatment 13.1-25.07-11.47-20-1.82 is suggested as regular K input is required for the respect of the fertilization laws”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1701 · show in text ↑

fertilization · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 71 positive, 9 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.