Abstract
Abstract Agricultural improvement (AI) in dryland became a priority for agricultural development in Aceh Province, Indonesia. AI is in line with government programs to increase the productivity of several types of second food crops such as peanuts. Up to now, the productivity of food crops, especially peanut on dryland in Aceh Province, based on farmers’ practice, was still very low, i.e 0.95 tons ha -1 . Biochar is one of the options for soil management and has the potential to improve soil fertility. The objectives of this research were to study the effect of rice husk biochar residue, cocopeat biochar residue, and cow manure residue on Entisol chemical properties, peanut growth, and production. Rice husk biochar, cocopeat biochar, and cow manure were applied on the first season of peanut growth. The research was conducted using factorial 6 × 3 with three replications, and the treatment units were allocated based on Randomized Block Design. The first factor was rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue with 3 doses (0; 2.5; 5 t ha -1 ) and cow manure residue with 3 doses (0; 2.5; 5 t ha -1 ) as the second factor. The soil chemical properties and root samples were analyzed on 45 days after planting and peanut production after harvest. The observed variables of crops were (1) plant height, (2) branches number (3) plant dry weight; (4) root dry weight; (5) root nodules number, (6) pods weight, (7) pods total, (8) filled pods, (9) seed weight, and (10) weight of 100 seeds. The observed variables of soil chemical properties were (1) pH, (2) C-organic; (3) Total N; (4) P available; and (5) K exchangeable. The results showed that rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly, such as plant height 15 and 30 DAP, peanut pods, and seed weight per plant. Nevertheless, both had a positive effect on plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number, and 100 seeds weight. The best residual dosage of rice husk biochar and cocopeat biochar was 2.5 t ha -1 . Cow manure residue did not give a significant effect on soil chemical properties, plant height 15, 30 and 45 DAP, branches number 30, 45 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number, peanut pods, seed weight per plant, and 100 seeds weight, but had a positive effect on the number of branches 15 DAP. The best dosage of cow manure residue was 2.5 t ha -1
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Rice-husk biochar residue had no significant effect on soil chemical properties.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- rice husk biochar residuee0
- Outcome
- soil chemical propertiese0
- Direction
- does not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cocopeat biochar residue had no significant effect on soil chemical properties.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cocopeat biochar residuee0
- Outcome
- soil chemical propertiese0
- Direction
- does not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice-husk biochar residue did not significantly affect peanut height at 15 and 30 DAP, pods, or seed weight per plant.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- rice husk biochar residuee0
- Outcome
- plant height 15 and 30 DAP, peanut pods, and seed weight per plante0
- Direction
- does not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly, such as plant height 15 and 30 DAP, peanut pods, and seed weight per plant”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cocopeat biochar residue did not significantly affect peanut height at 15 and 30 DAP, pods, or seed weight per plant.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cocopeat biochar residuee0
- Outcome
- plant height 15 and 30 DAP, peanut pods, and seed weight per plante0
- Direction
- does not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly, such as plant height 15 and 30 DAP, peanut pods, and seed weight per plant”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice-husk biochar residue positively affected peanut height at 45 DAP and branch counts at 15, 30, and 40 DAP.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- rice husk biochar residuee1
- Outcome
- plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAPe0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both had a positive effect on plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAP”
t0“peanut”
e1“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Cocopeat biochar residue positively affected peanut height at 45 DAP and branch counts at 15, 30, and 40 DAP.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cocopeat biochar residuee1
- Outcome
- plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAPe0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both had a positive effect on plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAP”
t0“peanut”
e1“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice-husk biochar residue positively affected peanut root dry weight, plant dry weight, and nodule count.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- rice husk biochar residuee1
- Outcome
- root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules numbere0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both had a positive effect on plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number, and 100 seeds weight”
t0“peanut”
e1“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Cocopeat biochar residue positively affected peanut root dry weight, plant dry weight, and nodule count.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cocopeat biochar residuee1
- Outcome
- root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules numbere0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both had a positive effect on plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number, and 100 seeds weight”
t0“peanut”
e1“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice-husk biochar residue positively affected peanut 100-seed weight.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- rice husk biochar residuee1
- Outcome
- 100 seeds weighte0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both had a positive effect on plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number, and 100 seeds weight”
t0“peanut”
e1“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Cocopeat biochar residue positively affected peanut 100-seed weight.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cocopeat biochar residuee1
- Outcome
- 100 seeds weighte0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both had a positive effect on plant height 45 DAP, branches number 15, 30, 40 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number, and 100 seeds weight”
t0“peanut”
e1“rice husk biochar residue and cocopeat biochar residue does not affect soil chemical properties significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
The best residual biochar dose was reported as 2.5 t ha -1.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- rice husk biochar and cocopeat biochare0
- Outcome
- best residual dosagee0
- Value
- 2.5 t ha -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best residual dosage of rice husk biochar and cocopeat biochar was 2.5 t ha -1”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure residue did not significantly affect soil chemical properties.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Cow manure residuee0
- Outcome
- soil chemical propertiese0
- Direction
- did not give a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cow manure residue did not give a significant effect on soil chemical properties”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure residue did not significantly affect peanut height at 15, 30, or 45 DAP or branches at 30 and 45 DAP.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Cow manure residuee0
- Outcome
- plant height 15, 30 and 45 DAP, branches number 30, 45 DAPe0
- Direction
- did not give a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cow manure residue did not give a significant effect on soil chemical properties, plant height 15, 30 and 45 DAP, branches number 30, 45 DAP”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure residue did not significantly affect root or plant dry weight or root nodule count.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Cow manure residuee0
- Outcome
- root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules numbere0
- Direction
- did not give a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cow manure residue did not give a significant effect on soil chemical properties, plant height 15, 30 and 45 DAP, branches number 30, 45 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure residue did not significantly affect pods, seed weight per plant, or 100-seed weight.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Cow manure residuee0
- Outcome
- peanut pods, seed weight per plant, and 100 seeds weighte0
- Direction
- did not give a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cow manure residue did not give a significant effect on soil chemical properties, plant height 15, 30 and 45 DAP, branches number 30, 45 DAP, root dry weight, plant dry weight, root nodules number, peanut pods, seed weight per plant, and 100 seeds weight”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure residue positively affected peanut branch number at 15 DAP.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cow manure residuee1
- Outcome
- number of branches 15 DAPe0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“had a positive effect on the number of branches 15 DAP”
t0“peanut”
e1“Cow manure residue did not give a significant effect”
Claim · model-written summary
The best cow-manure residue dose was reported as 2.5 t ha -1.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- best dosage of cow manure residuee0
- Value
- 2.5 t ha -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best dosage of cow manure residue was 2.5 t ha -1”
t0“peanut”
The same questions in other papers
Oryza sativa · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Oryza sativa · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Oryza sativa · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
growing medium · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
growing medium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →biochar · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 182 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
200 papers more in this group
See all 204 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.