Paper · 2021 · Journal of Forest Research

The production and nutrients in the fine roots of fertilized Pinus tabulaeformis plantation forests in the Loess Plateau in China

Lili Chen; Zhiyou Yuan; T. Ryan Lock; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fine roots (FRs; <2 mm in diameter) might act as substantial pools of underground carbon and nutrients in the forest ecosystem. Since nutrient availability directly impacts plant growth, any changes in soil fertilization and subsequent changes in nutrients would alter the production of FRs. Here, we investigated the impact of fertilization with nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) [control, N (200 kg/ha/y), P (100 kg/ha/y), and N + P (200 kg N/ha/y + 100 kg P/ha/y)] on the FR production, biomass, turnover rate, N:P ratio in young (10-year) and nearly mature (40-year) Pinus tabulaeformis forest stands in the Loess Plateau in China. The production and biomass of FRs were evaluated using the ingrowth core and the soil core methods, respectively. The results showed that during the first growing season after N or P fertilization, neither the production, biomass nor the turnover rate of FRs responded significantly to the treatments. A substantial increase in the TN content was observed after fertilization with N, P, and N + P in the FR of the young forest stand, but not in the mature forest stand. The ratio of N:P in FRs increased after N addition but did not respond to P addition significantly in either the young or mature forest stands, indicating that FR N:P ratio was affected more by N availability than by P availability in P. tabulaeformis forests on the Loess Plateau.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

During the first growing season after N or P fertilization, fine root production, biomass and turnover rate did not respond significantly compared with control.

Taxon
Pinus tabulaeformisPinus tabuliformise0
Organ / stage
FRse1
Treatment
N or P fertilizatione1
Outcome
production, biomass nor the turnover rate of FRse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
controle0
Setting
Loess Plateau in Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus tabuliformis
Pinus tabuliformis · TaxonIanz on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[control, N (200 kg/ha/y), P (100 kg/ha/y), and N + P (200 kg N/ha/y + 100 kg P/ha/y)] on the FR production, biomass, turnover rate, N:P ratio in young (10-year) and nearly mature (40-year) Pinus tabulaeformis forest stands in the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“during the first growing season after N or P fertilization, neither the production, biomass nor the turnover rate of FRs responded significantly to the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization with N, P and N + P substantially increased fine root TN content in the young forest stand but not in the mature stand.

Taxon
Pinus tabulaeformisPinus tabuliformise0
Organ / stage
FRe2
Treatment
fertilization with N, P, and N + Pe2
Outcome
TN contente2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
but not in the mature forest stande2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus tabuliformis
Pinus tabuliformis · TaxonIanz on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[control, N (200 kg/ha/y), P (100 kg/ha/y), and N + P (200 kg N/ha/y + 100 kg P/ha/y)] on the FR production, biomass, turnover rate, N:P ratio in young (10-year) and nearly mature (40-year) Pinus tabulaeformis forest stands in the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–632 · show in text ↑
e2

“A substantial increase in the TN content was observed after fertilization with N, P, and N + P in the FR of the young forest stand, but not in the mature forest stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N addition increased the N:P ratio in fine roots of Pinus tabulaeformis stands.

Taxon
Pinus tabulaeformisPinus tabuliformise0
Organ / stage
FRse3
Treatment
N additione3
Outcome
ratio of N:P in FRse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus tabuliformis
Pinus tabuliformis · TaxonIanz on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[control, N (200 kg/ha/y), P (100 kg/ha/y), and N + P (200 kg N/ha/y + 100 kg P/ha/y)] on the FR production, biomass, turnover rate, N:P ratio in young (10-year) and nearly mature (40-year) Pinus tabulaeformis forest stands in the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–632 · show in text ↑
e3

“The ratio of N:P in FRs increased after N addition but did not respond to P addition significantly in either the young or mature forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P addition did not significantly change the N:P ratio in fine roots of Pinus tabulaeformis stands.

Taxon
Pinus tabulaeformisPinus tabuliformise0
Organ / stage
FRse3
Treatment
P additione3
Outcome
ratio of N:P in FRse3
Direction
did not responde3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus tabuliformis
Pinus tabuliformis · TaxonIanz on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[control, N (200 kg/ha/y), P (100 kg/ha/y), and N + P (200 kg N/ha/y + 100 kg P/ha/y)] on the FR production, biomass, turnover rate, N:P ratio in young (10-year) and nearly mature (40-year) Pinus tabulaeformis forest stands in the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–632 · show in text ↑
e3

“The ratio of N:P in FRs increased after N addition but did not respond to P addition significantly in either the young or mature forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1246 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR N:P ratio was affected more by N availability than by P availability in P. tabulaeformis forests on the Loess Plateau.

Taxon
P. tabulaeformisPinus tabuliformise4
Treatment
N availabilitye4
Outcome
FR N:P ratioe4
Comparator
P availabilitye4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus tabuliformis
Pinus tabuliformis · TaxonIanz on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“indicating that FR N:P ratio was affected more by N availability than by P availability in P. tabulaeformis forests on the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1384 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Pinus tabuliformis (southern Chinese pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.