Paper · 2014 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Effects of water stress and re-watering at booting and grain filling stages on physiology and yield of Guiliangyou 2

WU Long-me

20
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Object】The experiment was conducted to study the physiological effects,grain yield and yield components of Guiliangyou 2 under water stress and re-watering to get water stress threshold value in order to provide reference for its water-saving irrigation cultivation. 【Method】By using pot experiment, CK(normal irrigation, NI) and four water stress treatments viz., T1(micro-slight stress, soil water content accounting for 90%-100% of saturation moisture content), T2(slight stress, 80%-90% of), T3(moderate stress, 70%-80%) and T4(serious stress, 60%-70%), were designed for super rice Guiliangyou 2 at booting and grain filling stages. The physiological indices of leaf were measured after 15 days of water stress and 10 days of re-watering, and grain yield was measured at mature stage. 【Results】As compared with the control, malondialdehyde(MDA), soluble protein, soluble sugar, and chlorophyll relative content(SPAD value) in rice leaves were increased after 15 days of water stresses at booting stage, and all of them were found the highest(7.53 μmol/gFW,36.55 mg/gFW, 11.30 mg/gFW and 39.08) in treatment T4, which significantly increased by 21.84%, 57.00%, 61.20%and 20.36%. The above-mentioned indices were found to be the lowest in T1 treatment. After 10 days of re-watering at booting stage, it found that MDA content of treatment T2, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents of treatment T3 and chlorophyll relative content of T4 treatment had the highest increases by 16.09%, 54.23%, 33.96% and 11.31%. The proline content of leaf in T2 treatment was higher than other treatments after water stress and re-watering at booting stage At grain filling stage, after 15 days of water stress, the MDA and chlorophyll relative content in leaves of different treatments increased firstly and decreased at later along with increasing extent of water stress, and the highest one presented in T2treatment. The soluble protein and sugar contents showed gradual increase and reached the highest in T4 treatment. After10 days of re-watering, MDA, chlorophyll relative content, soluble protein and soluble sugar in leaves presented change trend of increase first and then decrease in different treatments. These indices of T1 treatment were a little higher than the control but lower than the other treatments. With increase extent of water stress, the proline content in leaves decreased constantly. The yield and its component factors of Guiliangyou 2 presented the best in T1 treatment after water stress at boot stageand grain filling stage, respectively, and the yield increased by 18.15% and 10.92% compared with the control,while the other treatments showed worse comprehensive performance than the control. 【Conclusion】The micro-slight water stress can enhance drought resistance of Guiliangyou 2 and get better compensatory effects after re-watering. Guiliangyou 2was more sensitive to water stress at booting stage than grain filling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At booting, severe water stress increased leaf MDA by 21.84% over control.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Organ / stage
rice leavese0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
malondialdehyde(MDA)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.84%e0
Qualifier
booting stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde(MDA), soluble protein, soluble sugar, and chlorophyll relative content(SPAD value) in rice leaves were increased after 15 days of water stresses at booting stage, and all of them were found the highest(7.53 μmol/gFW,36.55 mg/gFW, 11.30 mg/gFW and 39.08) in treatment T4, which significantly increased by 21.84%, 57.00%, 61.20%and 20.36%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At booting, T4 increased leaf soluble protein by 57.00%.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
soluble proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soluble protein, soluble sugar, and chlorophyll relative content(SPAD value) in rice leaves were increased after 15 days of water stresses at booting stage, and all of them were found the highest(7.53 μmol/gFW,36.55 mg/gFW, 11.30 mg/gFW and 39.08) in treatment T4, which significantly increased by 21.84%, 57.00%, 61.20%and 20.36%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At booting, T4 increased leaf soluble sugar by 61.20%.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
soluble sugare0
Direction
increasede0
Value
61.20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soluble sugar, and chlorophyll relative content(SPAD value) in rice leaves were increased after 15 days of water stresses at booting stage, and all of them were found the highest(7.53 μmol/gFW,36.55 mg/gFW, 11.30 mg/gFW and 39.08) in treatment T4, which significantly increased by 21.84%, 57.00%, 61.20%and 20.36%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At booting, T4 increased SPAD by 20.36%.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
chlorophyll relative content(SPAD value)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll relative content(SPAD value) in rice leaves were increased after 15 days of water stresses at booting stage, and all of them were found the highest(7.53 μmol/gFW,36.55 mg/gFW, 11.30 mg/gFW and 39.08) in treatment T4, which significantly increased by 21.84%, 57.00%, 61.20%and 20.36%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At booting, T1 gave the lowest measured leaf indices.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T1 treatmente0
Outcome
indicese0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The above-mentioned indices were found to be the lowest in T1 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1256 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After re-watering at booting, T2 had the greatest MDA increase, 16.09%.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
treatment T2e0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
16.09%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 10 days of re-watering at booting stage, it found that MDA content of treatment T2, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents of treatment T3 and chlorophyll relative content of T4 treatment had the highest increases by 16.09%, 54.23%, 33.96% and 11.31%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After re-watering at booting, T3 had the greatest soluble protein increase, 54.23%.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
treatment T3e0
Outcome
soluble proteine0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
54.23%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 10 days of re-watering at booting stage, it found that MDA content of treatment T2, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents of treatment T3 and chlorophyll relative content of T4 treatment had the highest increases by 16.09%, 54.23%, 33.96% and 11.31%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After re-watering at booting, T3 had the greatest soluble sugar increase, 33.96%.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
treatment T3e0
Outcome
soluble sugare0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
33.96%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 10 days of re-watering at booting stage, it found that MDA content of treatment T2, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents of treatment T3 and chlorophyll relative content of T4 treatment had the highest increases by 16.09%, 54.23%, 33.96% and 11.31%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After re-watering at booting, T4 had the greatest chlorophyll increase, 11.31%.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T4 treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll relative contente0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
11.31%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 10 days of re-watering at booting stage, it found that MDA content of treatment T2, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents of treatment T3 and chlorophyll relative content of T4 treatment had the highest increases by 16.09%, 54.23%, 33.96% and 11.31%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had higher leaf proline than other treatments after booting stress and re-watering.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T2 treatmente0
Outcome
proline content of leafe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The proline content of leaf in T2 treatment was higher than other treatments after water stress and re-watering at booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1647 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At grain filling, leaf MDA and chlorophyll first increased then decreased as water stress intensified, peaking at T2.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
MDA and chlorophyll relative content in leavese0
Direction
increased firstly and decreased at latere0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“the MDA and chlorophyll relative content in leaves of different treatments increased firstly and decreased at later along with increasing extent of water stress, and the highest one presented in T2treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At grain filling, soluble protein and sugar rose with stress and peaked in T4.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T4 treatmente0
Outcome
soluble protein and sugar contentse0
Direction
gradual increasee0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soluble protein and sugar contents showed gradual increase and reached the highest in T4 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2014 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After re-watering at grain filling, four leaf indices first increased and then decreased across treatments.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
re-wateringe0
Outcome
MDA, chlorophyll relative content, soluble protein and soluble sugar in leavese0
Direction
increase first and then decreasee0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“After10 days of re-watering, MDA, chlorophyll relative content, soluble protein and soluble sugar in leaves presented change trend of increase first and then decrease in different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2015–2206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At grain filling after re-watering, T1 indices were slightly above control and below other treatments.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
T1 treatmente0
Outcome
These indicese0
Direction
a little highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“These indices of T1 treatment were a little higher than the control but lower than the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2207–2311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf proline declined as water stress intensified.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
proline content in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“With increase extent of water stress, the proline content in leaves decreased constantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 at booting raised yield 18.15% relative to control.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2e0
Treatment
T1 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.15%e0
Qualifier
boot stagee0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield and its component factors of Guiliangyou 2 presented the best in T1 treatment after water stress at boot stageand grain filling stage, respectively, and the yield increased by 18.15% and 10.92% compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2402–2631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 at grain filling raised yield 10.92% relative to control.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2e0
Treatment
T1 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.92%e0
Qualifier
grain filling stagee0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and its component factors of Guiliangyou 2 presented the best in T1 treatment after water stress at boot stageand grain filling stage, respectively, and the yield increased by 18.15% and 10.92% compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2402–2631 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other water stress treatments performed worse overall than control.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2t0
Treatment
other treatmentse0
Outcome
comprehensive performancee0
Direction
worsee0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Guiliangyou 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“while the other treatments showed worse comprehensive performance than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2632–2715 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro-slight stress enhanced drought resistance and compensation after re-watering.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2e0
Treatment
micro-slight water stresse0
Outcome
drought resistance of Guiliangyou 2 and get better compensatory effectse0
Direction
enhancee0

Verbatim

e0

“The micro-slight water stress can enhance drought resistance of Guiliangyou 2 and get better compensatory effects after re-watering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2728–2860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guiliangyou 2 was more sensitive to water stress at booting than grain filling.

Taxon
Guiliangyou 2e0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
sensitivee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
grain filling stagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Guiliangyou 2was more sensitive to water stress at booting stage than grain filling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2861–2951 · show in text ↑