Paper · 2014

Effect of Activebag® Modified Atmosphere Packaging on the Postharvest Characteristics of Mango Fruits, Mangifera indica L, Cultivar

T.A. Atkins

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objective: This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits. Methodology and results: The fruits were harvested from a commercial orchard, (Karurumo Orchards) located in Embu county of Eastern province. The fruits were harvested at advanced maturity during the pre-climacteric rise phase when most of the flesh had turned yellow. They were selected for uniformity in colour, size and shape and randomly separated into three equal batches of 50 fruits each. The first batch was packaged in Activebag®, second batch in ordinary (commercially used) polythene bags while the third batch was left unpackaged as control. Five fruits from each treatment were sampled every three days during the shelf life period and evaluated for various physiological and physicochemical parameters associated with mango ripening and quality including ethylene evolution, respiration rate, cumulative weight loss, firmness, hue angle, total soluble solids, total titratable acid, soluble sugars, ascorbic acid and beta-carotene. MAP whether in Activebag® or ordinary polythene was effective in maintaining the quality of mango fruits compared to the unpackaged controls. Slow ripening changes of Activebag® fruits was accompanied by a delayed respiratory climacteric and generally lower respiration rates compared to ordinary bag and unpackaged fruits. At the end of the observation period, Activebag® fruits were 16% firmer compared to unpackaged fruits. The initial average weight was 635g and modified atmosphere packaging had a remarkable effect on cumulative weight loss with fruits packaged in the ordinary polythene bag and Activebag® fruits losing only 7.4% of the initial weight compared to 12% in the case of unpackaged fruits (control). Higher levels of total soluble solids (°brix) 5.5g/100g and total soluble sugars (6g/100g) observed at the beginning of storage (6 days after packaging) signalled advanced ripening of unpackaged fruits. However as the storage time progressed, the levels of each of the soluble sugars evaluated were higher in Activebag® fruits. Similarly, Activebag® fruits retained higher levels of titratable acidity (0.39%and ascorbic acid compared to ordinary bag fruits (0.36%). Conclusion: Packaging mangoes in Activebag® after harvest at ripe stage was effective in delaying most of the ripening related changes in mango fruits thereby maintaining the quality and extending their shelf life. Although ordinary polythene packaging maintained quality of the fruits better than unpackaged fruits, the positive effects were negated by high incidences of rotting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified atmosphere packaging was effective in maintaining the quality of mango fruits compared to unpackaged controls.

Treatment
MAPe1
Outcome
quality of mango fruitse1
Direction
effective in maintaininge1
Comparator
unpackaged controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“MAP whether in Activebag® or ordinary polythene was effective in maintaining the quality of mango fruits compared to the unpackaged controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activebag fruits showed a delayed respiratory climacteric compared to ordinary bag and unpackaged fruits.

Treatment
Activebag®e2
Outcome
respiratory climacterice2
Direction
delayede2
Comparator
ordinary bag and unpackaged fruitse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“Slow ripening changes of Activebag® fruits was accompanied by a delayed respiratory climacteric and generally lower respiration rates compared to ordinary bag and unpackaged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activebag fruits generally had lower respiration rates than ordinary bag and unpackaged fruits.

Treatment
Activebag®e2
Outcome
respiration ratese2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
ordinary bag and unpackaged fruitse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“Slow ripening changes of Activebag® fruits was accompanied by a delayed respiratory climacteric and generally lower respiration rates compared to ordinary bag and unpackaged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activebag fruits were 16% firmer than unpackaged fruits at the end of the observation period.

Treatment
Activebag®e3
Outcome
firmere3
Direction
firmere3
Value
16%e3
Comparator
unpackaged fruitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“At the end of the observation period, Activebag® fruits were 16% firmer compared to unpackaged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified atmosphere packaging lost only 7.4% cumulative weight, compared to 12% for unpackaged mango fruits.

Treatment
modified atmosphere packaginge4
Outcome
cumulative weight losse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
7.4%e4
Qualifier
12%e4
Comparator
unpackaged fruitse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“modified atmosphere packaging had a remarkable effect on cumulative weight loss with fruits packaged in the ordinary polythene bag and Activebag® fruits losing only 7.4% of the initial weight compared to 12% in the case of unpackaged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unpackaged mango fruits had higher total soluble solids (5.5 g/100 g) at the beginning of storage, signalling advanced ripening.

Outcome
total soluble solids (°brix)e5
Value
5.5g/100ge5
Qualifier
at the beginning of storagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“Higher levels of total soluble solids (°brix) 5.5g/100g and total soluble sugars (6g/100g) observed at the beginning of storage (6 days after packaging) signalled advanced ripening of unpackaged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugars were higher in Activebag mango fruits as storage progressed.

Treatment
Activebag®e6
Outcome
soluble sugarse6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
as the storage time progressede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e6

“as the storage time progressed, the levels of each of the soluble sugars evaluated were higher in Activebag® fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1984–2099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activebag fruits retained higher titratable acidity (0.39%) than ordinary bag fruits (0.36%).

Treatment
Activebag®e7
Outcome
titratable aciditye7
Direction
highere7
Value
0.39%e7
Qualifier
0.36%e7
Comparator
ordinary bag fruitse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“Activebag® fruits retained higher levels of titratable acidity (0.39%and ascorbic acid compared to ordinary bag fruits (0.36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2112–2237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activebag fruits retained higher ascorbic acid than ordinary bag fruits.

Treatment
Activebag®e7
Outcome
ascorbic acide7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
ordinary bag fruitse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“Activebag® fruits retained higher levels of titratable acidity (0.39%and ascorbic acid compared to ordinary bag fruits (0.36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2112–2237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ordinary polythene packaging maintained mango fruit quality better than unpackaged fruits.

Treatment
ordinary polythene packaginge1
Outcome
quality of the fruitse1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
unpackaged fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although ordinary polythene packaging maintained quality of the fruits better than unpackaged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2455–2555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ordinary polythene packaging led to high incidences of rotting in mango fruits.

Treatment
ordinary polythene packaginge1
Outcome
incidences of rottinge2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although ordinary polythene packaging maintained quality of the fruits better than unpackaged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2455–2555 · show in text ↑
e2

“the positive effects were negated by high incidences of rotting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2557–2620 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging mangoes in Activebag after harvest at the ripe stage is recommended for delaying most ripening-related changes.

Treatment
Packaging mangoes in Activebag®e1
Outcome
delaying most of the ripening related changese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was to evaluate the efficacy of MAP in maintaining the postharvest quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Packaging mangoes in Activebag® after harvest at ripe stage was effective in delaying most of the ripening related changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2252–2374 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

poly(ethylene) · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

storage · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 105 positive, 4 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.