Paper · 2014 · Xi'nan nongye xuebao

Effects of Silicon Fertilization on Growth,Yield and Quality of Sugarcane

Jiang Xiong-yin

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to research the effects of silicon fertilizer on the growth yield and quality of sugarcane in strongly acidic latosolic red soil,five Si fertilizer dose( 0,45,90,135 and 225 kg / hm2) and one sugarcane variety( GT 02-208) were used in this field trial. Soil available Si content,Si content in leaves,plant growth,yield,cane quality,production and economic performance of sugarcane were analyzed. The results showed that Si applications significantly increased Si levels in both soil and leaf blades. The plant growth,yield and sugar content of sugarcane were significantly affected by Si application,compared to the control,Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2) increased the emergence number,the plant height of sugarcane by 27 %- 39 %,9 %- 11 %,the yield by 10 %- 21 %,the net income of sugarcane by 3. 0-8. 1 thousand CNY / hm2,and the sugar content by 4. 5 %- 12. 7 %,respectively. Compared with different levels of Si applications,no significant difference in the growth,yield and sugar content of sugarcane were observed between 45 kg / hm2 Si application and other Si applications( 90- 135 kg / hm2),but net incomes of sugarcane and sugar at 45 kg/hm2 Si application were higher than those of other Si application levels. This conclusion indicated that application of Si fertilizer on strongly acidic lateritic red soil could be beneficial to improve the growth of yield and quality of sugarcanes. The recommended dose of Si fertilizer in sugarcane production was 45 kg / hm2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applications significantly increased soil and leaf silicon levels.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Si applicationse0
Outcome
Si levels in both soil and leaf bladese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si applications significantly increased Si levels in both soil and leaf blades.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applications of 45 to 135 kg/hm2 increased sugarcane emergence number by 27% to 39% versus control.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2)e0
Outcome
emergence numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27 %- 39 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2) increased the emergence number,the plant height of sugarcane by 27 %- 39 %,9 %- 11 %,the yield by 10 %- 21 %,the net income of sugarcane by 3. 0-8. 1 thousand CNY / hm2,and the sugar content by 4. 5 %- 12. 7 %,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applications increased sugarcane plant height by 9% to 11%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9 %- 11 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2) increased the emergence number,the plant height of sugarcane by 27 %- 39 %,9 %- 11 %,the yield by 10 %- 21 %,the net income of sugarcane by 3. 0-8. 1 thousand CNY / hm2,and the sugar content by 4. 5 %- 12. 7 %,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applications increased sugarcane yield by 10% to 21%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10 %- 21 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2) increased the emergence number,the plant height of sugarcane by 27 %- 39 %,9 %- 11 %,the yield by 10 %- 21 %,the net income of sugarcane by 3. 0-8. 1 thousand CNY / hm2,and the sugar content by 4. 5 %- 12. 7 %,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applications increased sugarcane net income by 3.0 to 8.1 thousand CNY/hm2.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2)e0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3. 0-8. 1 thousand CNY / hm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2) increased the emergence number,the plant height of sugarcane by 27 %- 39 %,9 %- 11 %,the yield by 10 %- 21 %,the net income of sugarcane by 3. 0-8. 1 thousand CNY / hm2,and the sugar content by 4. 5 %- 12. 7 %,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applications increased sugarcane sugar content by 4.5% to 12.7%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2)e0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4. 5 %- 12. 7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si applications( 45- 135 kg / hm2) increased the emergence number,the plant height of sugarcane by 27 %- 39 %,9 %- 11 %,the yield by 10 %- 21 %,the net income of sugarcane by 3. 0-8. 1 thousand CNY / hm2,and the sugar content by 4. 5 %- 12. 7 %,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth, yield and sugar content did not differ significantly between 45 kg/hm2 silicon and 90 to 135 kg/hm2.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
45 kg / hm2 Si applicatione0
Outcome
growth,yield and sugar contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
other Si applications( 90- 135 kg / hm2)e0

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference in the growth,yield and sugar content of sugarcane were observed between 45 kg / hm2 Si application and other Si applications( 90- 135 kg / hm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane and sugar net incomes were higher at 45 kg/hm2 silicon than at other levels.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
45 kg/hm2 Si applicatione0
Outcome
net incomes of sugarcane and sugare0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other Si application levelse0

Verbatim

e0

“net incomes of sugarcane and sugar at 45 kg/hm2 Si application were higher than those of other Si application levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1234 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 45 kg/hm2 silicon fertilizer for sugarcane production.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
recommended dose of Si fertilizere0
Value
45 kg / hm2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The recommended dose of Si fertilizer in sugarcane production was 45 kg / hm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1489 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.