silicon atom · Yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)
29 claims from these papers; 10 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 9
9 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Silicon fertilization reduces the deleterious effects of water deficit in sugarcane (2017)
increaseSilicon fertilization improved sugar, stalk yield, and dry biomass after early and late water deficit in both cultivars compared with no silicon.
Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
What separates themSituation: drought · not statedCompare the two papers → - EFFECTS OF SILICON ON YIELD CONTRIBUTING PARAMETERS AND ITS ACCUMULATION IN ABAXIAL EPIDERMIS OF SUGARCANE LEAF BLADES USING ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY ANALYSIS (2012)
increaseSilicon amendment increased cane yield by 30 to 66% per pot.
Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Studies on the effects of silicon,magnesium,boron fertilizer on yield and sugar yield of sugarcane (2004)
increasesilicon fertilizer increased sugarcane yield from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 compared with CK.
Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of silicon fertilization on yield and photosynthetic attributes in Sugarcane(Saccharum officinarum L. hybrid) (2009)
increaseSilicon treatments significantly increased cane yield by 30%-66%.
Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)
no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
Effects of Silicon Fertilization on Growth,Yield and Quality of Sugarcane (2014)increaseSilicon applications increased sugarcane yield by 10% to 21%.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)
no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
Water deficit modifies C:N:P stoichiometry affecting sugarcane and energy cane yield and its relationships with silicon supply (2021)increaseSilicon supply via fertirrigation increased stem dry matter production in sugarcane and energy cane.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
Show 3 more pairs
- Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)
no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
Impact of Si on C, N, and P stoichiometric homeostasis favors nutrition and stem dry mass accumulation in sugarcane cultivated in tropical soils with different water regimes (2022)increaseSi fertigation increased dry mass production in sugarcane.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)
no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
Silicon fertilizer mediated structural variation and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome and metabolites of sugarcane (2022)increaseSilicon increased sugarcane yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Silicon absorption by sugarcane: effect of soils type and silicate fertilization (2009)
no changeAdding silicon did not change sugarcane dry matter yield.
Synergistic effects of silicon-induced photosynthesis and fungal diversity on sugarcane yield (2026)increaseT2 increased sugarcane yield by 6.82–23.57%.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
10 citations between these papers: 10 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 19
A Study and Development of a Trace Element Fertilizer with Rich Silicon · 1999
- positive
- positive
- positive
Studies on the effects of silicon,magnesium,boron fertilizer on yield and sugar yield of sugarcane · 2004
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of Silicon Fertilization on Growth,Yield and Quality of Sugarcane · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
Silicon fertilization reduces the deleterious effects of water deficit in sugarcane · 2017
- positive
- positive
Silicon Alleviates Drought Stress of Sugarcane Plants by Improving Antioxidant Responses · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Extractable soil silicon in relation to sugarcane yield on mineral soil · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
Synergistic effects of silicon-induced photosynthesis and fungal diversity on sugarcane yield · 2026
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.